Log in to your IBTimes Account

close
ID
Password

Smartphone Wars: Palm Pre versus iPhone versus BlackBerry Storm 2 versus HTC Hero and the winner is...(5)



By Charles Smith
16 October 2009 @ 07:55 pm BST

London - In our previous article Smartphone Wars: Palm Pre versus iPhone versus BlackBerry Storm 2 versus HTC Hero and the winner is...(4) , in the final fight between Palm Pre and iPhone for the title of the smartest of the smartphones, we saw the former throw some killer punches that floored Apple's popular handset. However, as we enter the final round, we find that Palm Pre has its weaknesses too.

For instance, iPhone scores over Palm Pre in terms of onboard memory. Unlike Palm Pre, which comes shipped with 8GB memory as standard, iPhone 3GS (the latest model of iPhone) comes in two variant - 16GB and 32GB. This is a big plus for iPhone as both the phones lack a memory card slot to expand on its built-in storage.

Moreover, while Palm Pre has only a 3.1-megapixel camera (with fixed focus) and LED flash, the newer iPhone viz. iPhone 3GS is also equipped with 3.15-megapixel camera but with auto-focus and video recording capability (at 30 fps).

Besides, the apps available with Palm Pre are much less when compared to those of iPhone. While Apple Inc. offers iPhone users access to its legendary AppStore where the users can find over 90,000 games and applications, both for free and a small cost, Palm Pre has only about 100 in its apps store (though it includes some cool apps like Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?, WeatherBug Elite and Checkers Pro priced between 99 cents and $9.95).

And, never mind that iTunes syncing sometimes doesn't work on Palm Pre, the media apps themselves leave much to be desired. For instance, rather than picking up from where one stopped, the Pre would always restart a podcast from the beginning each time one quits and relaunched the music player. And, though Palm Pre has plenty of onscreen real estate for controlling media, it only has small rewind, play and fast forward buttons at the bottom of the touchscreen and no playhead to drag to a certain point in a podcast.

Also, Palm Pre's web browser, though light years ahead of Windows Mobile and BlackBerry, is just slightly behind the iPhone. It is a little sluggish when scrolling while the smaller screen makes reading pages a bit harder.

Other letdowns include:

* The menu for each app is located in the top left corner of the screen, and is incredibly easy to miss (in both sense of the phrase);

* When importing your data, you have to enter in your details for contacts, calendar and email separately - it does not recognise a Google account and import all three services at one time;

* While the main screen and menu feel smooth, once a few apps are open the device can be slow to react. A faster processor is recommended;

This article is copyrighted by IBTimes.

    Click!
  • Rate this article:

Comments
1.
17 Oct 2009, 14:27 BST

A very nice article clearly comparing the pros and cons of Palm Pre and iPhone. I own an iPhone and the lack of multitasking does get very annoying. There are so many cases when you wish you can just switch to another application and come back without having the close the app you are currently in. Having said that, iPhone is still an amazing device. As the article states towards the end, it is up to your personal preferance and, so far, it seems that I can't say which is the best device. iPhone is excellent as a multimedia device with numerous cool features.
2.
17 Oct 2009, 15:59 BST

Another article written by Apple's PR department. Nice. It's amazing that a company that was so innovative in creating computers can NOT deliver a phone that multitasks. Even the Apple Mac in 1987 could multitask. So basically if you are using the GPS in your car, forget internet radio because you have to pick one or the other. If this isn't a major flaw that characterizes TOTAL inferiority, I don't know what is. This article is very suspect in its ability to be objective.
3.
17 Oct 2009, 21:09 BST

I don't think objective is what this is, il-informed and badly written I think would be more fitting. It states that the iPhone and Pre screen are comparable sized, then says the Pre's screen is noticable smaller. Then mentions this 2 more times. Proof reading would have made that a decent read. Case and point, optical zoom?

Post Your Comment

*Name


advertisement
advertisement

Real Time Economic & Market Headlines

Ransquawk news

More Real-time news »

More Technology
Microsoft has revealed its new attempt at a Phone OS - Windows Phone Series 7 will start afresh, removing the need for Windows features such as 'cut...
Chinese firms selling advertising space on Google's search pages have demanded clarity about the search giant's plans in China, as speculation increases ...
Shares of Intel Corp <INTC.O> jumped 4 percent to their highest in more than a year on expectations that robust Asian sales and a rebound in corpor...

 
 
IBTimes © 2010 The IBTimes Company Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Partners