Log in to your IBTimes Account

close
ID
Password

Smartphone Wars: Nokia N900 versus HTC HD2 versus Motorola Droid (5)



By Charles Smith
05 November 2009 @ 03:07 pm BST

London - In our previous article Smartphone Wars: Nokia N900 versus HTC HD2 versus Motorola Droid (4) , we have seen how bloody the fight amongst the N900, the HD2 and the Droid had been. All the contestants were equally matched and each one of them traded blow for blow.


Nokia N900 smartphone
Nokia N900 smartphone. (Photo: Nokia.com)
1 of 3

But now the final whistle has been blown and it is time to announce the winner of the slugfest. That's right, folks! The fight has been long, bloody and closely contested but only one phone has emerged as the winner, albeit bruised, and that is - the Nokia N900.

That's right folks!! The N900 is the king of the square ring as it packs killer punches such as the revolutionary Maemo platform, a camera with excellent optics and features, 32GB internal storage, and choices of a full Qwerty tactile keyboard as well as a virtual onscreen keyboard.

Of course, those who prefer capacitive touchscreen will think the N900's resistive touchscreen is a dumb idea. But believe me folks. Unlike the resistive touchscreen in other smartphones, the N900's touchscreen can actually pass off as capacitive touchscreen except for the fact that for managing some applications you would need the stylus and in typing the keyboard, you would need to exert more pressure on the screen than is necessary in a capacitive one.

Actually, capacitive screens are only advantageous when all you have deft fingers. But if you're a pro with a stylus, nothing beats resistive screens.

As for those who were betting on the HD2 as emerging the winner – well - all I can say is that I'm sorry though the HD2 did come close to being declared the winner. In fact, the HD2 could have well been the winner (thanks to its 1GHz Snapdragon processor, a whopping 4.3-inch touchscreen display and HTC Sense UI), had it not been let down (its biggest letdown, in fact) by the Windows Mobile 6.5 browser which is a far cry from the Maemo and the Android platform. Also, the HD2 has only onscreen keyboard for typing (What? No choices for buyers in the 21st century?) and those who are not used to typing onscreen will find it pretty challenging at times.

As for the Droid, well, it definitely has several rich features but none extraordinary (except perhaps for running on the Android platform).

Well, that's it, folks. The show's over now. You asked for it and we have thrown the three best smartphones (aka. heavy-duty multimedia phones) into the ring. All the three smartphones have enough rich features to boast of and can easily take the fight to the iPhone. But whether they can defeat the iPhone - well - that's another story which might be told some other day.

This article is copyrighted by IBTimes.

    Click!
  • Rate this article:

Comments
1.
5 Nov 2009, 15:56 BST

All of these phones are fully capable of defeating the eyephone.
2.
5 Nov 2009, 16:21 BST

cheers for Nokia N900
3.
5 Nov 2009, 16:30 BST

iPhone is nothing more than an eye candy. The author is right in saying that HD2 has been let down by WinMo OS. WinMo OS is s***. However, if HTC decides to ditch Microsoft later and tag along with Google, HD2 will beat the s*** out of N900.
4.
5 Nov 2009, 20:30 BST

Can't say I'd trust a reviewer who doesn't even know the correct size for the HD2 screen. Sounds to me like someone's trying to cash in on what's hot.
5.
5 Nov 2009, 20:54 BST

A clear win. But i don't get it, why would they even compare it to a piece or crap like iPhone?... ALL three competitors are better then iPhone. And no, i don't "just hate" iPhone, i had that piece of crap for 5 months, then that was it, i couldnt take it anymore.
6.
5 Nov 2009, 22:03 BST

Sounds good to me. I have both the N900 and Droid on pre-order. Anything non-Microsoft is a winner as far as I'm concerned.
7.
6 Nov 2009, 12:07 BST

"Can't say I'd trust a reviewer who doesn't even know the correct size for the HD2 screen. Sounds to me like someone's trying to cash in on what's hot." Aaa what? Clearly says above 4.3 inch screen? ...??
8.
6 Nov 2009, 12:52 BST

if u search on the net u will find that onscreen keyboard of hd2 is faster typing tha both hardware n900 and droid... and..it's windows mobile, the best. But hd2 lak on tv-out
9.
6 Nov 2009, 13:15 BST

I have been using the N900 for about 4 weeks now without a stylus and without any difficulties. All the official Nokia apps are finger friendly and the vast majority of community applications can be used easily with fingers.
10.
6 Nov 2009, 16:51 BST

Get over it. The HTC HD2 is by far the best out there. This reviewer was paid by Nokia. What a joke!!!
11.
6 Nov 2009, 18:03 BST

yeah blame the writer when the truth bites your windows mobile a_s_s.
12.
7 Nov 2009, 15:33 BST

A very bias review. The author keeps mentioning the crappy Internet Explorer of WM6.5 but (intentionally) forgot to mention the great OPERA MOBILE that has MULTITOUCH enabled. He keeps bashing that 512MB ROM is too small as though an add on storage is not an option.
13.
8 Nov 2009, 10:35 BST

Deserved Winner!
14.
8 Nov 2009, 13:34 BST

Such a shallow comparison, what about software availability ? how many are available for the Maemo platform, any idea?
15.
8 Nov 2009, 14:41 BST

Nokia N900 is so much better. I’ll buy it.
16.
8 Nov 2009, 14:59 BST

@balendra ~ The entire Linux library :D
17.
8 Nov 2009, 15:03 BST

@Bah and Charles - Are Microsoft's funds generous? Accept the reality, WinMo is in a huge decline...
18.
8 Nov 2009, 15:39 BST

This review is totally Biased! Ill prove that to you : The Author said "had it not been let down (its biggest letdown, in fact) by the Windows Mobile 6.5 browser which is a far cry from the Maemo and the Android platform. Also, the HD2 has only onscreen keyboard for typing (What? No choices for buyers in the 21st century?) and those who are not used to typing onscreen will find it pretty challenging at times." The HD2 infact has the Opera Browser as its Default which if you don't believe even outperforms the iPhone 3GS browser in terms of rendering speeds. (Proof : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJF63S3yYto ) And not to mention that its multi touch capable. Pinch to zoom is way better than the stupid rolling gesture which N900 provides. And the biggest of all, the HD2 offers a far better Internet Experience just for the fact that it has a HUGE screen! As for Maemo, Maemo totally lacks when it comes to applications. Windows Mobile has been there for a long time now and it offers thousands of Applications. Theres no way that the N900 can beat the HTC HD2!
19.
8 Nov 2009, 19:24 BST

I am used to Windows Mobile on my Hx4700. I like the application verstility, therefore I stay with HTC HD2.
20.
9 Nov 2009, 10:57 BST

I will never buy the Nokia N900 after this review. The reviewer is trying so hard to convince us that the Nokia is the best, he must be paid by Nokia. Don't believe a thing he said. I will stick with teh HD2. I like windows mobile. And the HD2 is going to make this even a better experience. Sack the reviewer.
21.
9 Nov 2009, 16:08 BST

Lol. For both the Nokia and the Droid, the reviewer complains about the cramped physical keyboard, and point out that the onscreen keyboard is better... Then goes on and complains about the lack of a physical keyboard on the HD2... great lack of consistency, and it's not the only case. In fact this article feels like that it was written by at least two different person preferring different devices, with a third writer trying to knit their articles together in the conclusion. Sad.
22.
9 Nov 2009, 16:14 BST

I not like reviewer. He not understand phone. Me vote HTC.
23.
9 Nov 2009, 17:30 BST

The N900's GPU and DSP is far superior to HD2's counterpart, while the HD2's CPU is better. It's up to you what you prefer, if you prefer 3D games and heavy multi-tasking or computer calculations. No matter what you prefer, enjoy your choise! One thing is sure though: Maemo is the best OS among these three!
24.
9 Nov 2009, 17:55 BST

Good luck with that Maemo. You gonna need it. Average phones to average people!!!
25.
10 Nov 2009, 02:03 BST

Even though the nokia won (which i agree with) the guy that wrote this review is an asshole. how dare u point out the looks of the N900 when the Droid is soo ugly? The ugly lip at the bottom, the dated lookin icons drawn on the bottom of the screen... what the hell, is it palm pilot? The 900 looks classy with the finishes etc. the HD is the nicest lookin physically but... thats too fuckin big for me... same reason i wouldnt want an Archos if i want to walk around with something in my hands or that i have to put in a back pack ill carry my macbook air. The OS of the 900 isnt revolutionary? compared to what, the iphone?... you dick if the home screens "confuse" you, then you should have a motorola razr cause obviously u get confused pretty easy. The 900 has 256 ram and an additional 700 MB virtual RAM (so its really a gig) . The HD has the massive processor but is gettin low memory alerts?.... i have yet to see any talk of low memory alerts pop up on the 900 review. The Droid is no major deal... if i wanted droid os i'd get it in a better device. The HD is decent but fuck Win Mo and its just too big for me (i think ill look like a douche wrestling that from my pocket and then puttin it to my ear). everybody is free to pick but i say 900 is ideal. as for the apps a bunch of linux apps will be revamped an converted and its not even fully released yet... give it some time the apps are coming.
26.
10 Nov 2009, 10:45 BST

Haha Enemy, your command if the English language is disastrous! The fact you can't make a point without swearing only proves that you are, in language you'll understand, an arsehole! Get a grip, you're pathetic.
27.
10 Nov 2009, 12:32 BST

This guy ( EnemyMine) doesn't know what his talking about. He is probably still stuck back in time when he had his first Nokia 3210. get over it. Nokia will never be a good smartphone producer. They are crap. And so is the 900 and droid. Like I said. You can have the Nokia. Average phone for average people. HTC HD2 RULE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
28.
10 Nov 2009, 14:58 BST

R6: "your command if the English language is disastrous!" no comment...
29.
10 Nov 2009, 16:28 BST

Church, a typo is different...you on the other hand are being pedantic, missed the point completely.
30.
10 Nov 2009, 21:13 BST

"This guy ( EnemyMine) doesn't know what his talking about. He is probably still stuck back in time when he had his first Nokia 3210." Or maybe he is still using it. Some of the devices actually last longer than the others :) In general, it is not especially demanding to integrate powerful processor and huge screen together. Although, it is not always that hardware specifications matters. For some people it is more important how those fancy hardware devices can be utilized.
31.
10 Nov 2009, 23:30 BST

I have been researching these devices for months, along with a few others not mentioned like the BB tour, Samsung Jack etc. At this time I intend on purchasing the n900, even without having the luxury of personally demoing it. Open source, projected battery life, Infrared port, QWERTY kb layout/key size, built-in stylus, the CZ lens/cam/dedicated cam key, Mozilla-powered browser, hotswappable microsd support...and no Windows Media Player are uncontested advantages over the competition as far as I'm concerned. Sure, the HTC has the largest screen by 4/5in, yet it shares the same max res with the n900; 800x480 giving the n900 finer dot pitch and smoother gfx....plus a GPU powerful enough and sufficient memory to actually take advantage. As for concern about the difference in CPU specs....this fella sums things up: http://www.hardforum.com/showpost.php?s=a71bd8c9595db4c2fe2431231ecf5539&p=1034699630&postcount=11
32.
11 Nov 2009, 11:10 BST

"I have been researching these devices for months, along with a few others not mentioned like the BB tour, Samsung Jack etc. At this time I intend on purchasing the n900, even without having the luxury of personally demoing it." SO YOU HAVE BEEN RECEARCHING FOR MONTHS AND YOU ARE STILL SLOW. THE N900 IS NO MATCH FOR THE HD2. IT'S NOT EVEN WORTH TO COMPARE THEM. THE HD2 IS FAR MORE SUPERIOR. SO CAN ALL THAT WAS NOT SUPPORTING THE HD2, NOW JUST SHUT THE HELL UP AND GO AND BUY YOUR CRAP PHONE. YOU WILL BE SORRY IN A FEW MONTHS. JUST STOP TRYING TO CONVINCE YOURSELF THAT THERE IS A BETTER PHONE THAN THE HD2. YOUR LYING TO YOURSELF. I really do feel sorry for everyone that is going to buy a N900. But the world needs people like these guys. If it wasn't for you, nobody would have admired the HD2. So please, BUY your CRAP N900!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
33.
11 Nov 2009, 11:45 BST

Can't wait to have linux in my pocket with a smooth browser experience! N900! \o/
34.
11 Nov 2009, 12:21 BST

lol is raged he wasted money on an inferior fancy phone device when he could have a netbook in his pocket that just so happens to make phone calls
35.
11 Nov 2009, 15:27 BST

N900 is shit comparing to the HD2. I agree with "lol". Losers can buy the N900 and wankers the Droid.
36.
11 Nov 2009, 19:29 BST

WinMo is a piece of shit. Get over with it.
37.
12 Nov 2009, 06:54 BST

To R6 the elderly school marm... im sorry if my "bad words" offended you... i didnt know they let you old bitches in here and i was unaware i walked into an English class... i thought we were talkin about phones. you can run on over and suck *lols'* dick. now *lol*.... why the FUCK (this ones for you R6 :)...) are u even here? im ordering one this week so im doing research. ur jus here to talk shit why dont you two go make a gameplan and come back with something factual as in good stats for the phones to prove something instead of countin my words and trying to find boyfriends... this is not facebook... that being said im open to somebody saying something valid (that hasnt already been said) on which device is better... (and R6... the persons name was chuch not Church. u old bitch go put ur glasses on... and ease up with the type-o's.) (notbuyingeither is right... somethings do last longer than others thats why My N95-8gig black and Tytn II are still kickin but the nokia is of better build quality and is more sturdy)
38.
12 Nov 2009, 10:37 BST

Hahahahahaha. This fool " EnemyMine" is a total dick. He is still trying to convince himself to buy the Nokia. Please, buy your piece of shit. Like I said before, it is not even worth to compare the HD2 to the N900. The HTC is far more superior. I still got no clue why the nutcase reviewer compared these phones. So please, stop crying and go and buy you shit N900. This phone will suite nicely with a fucknut like you!!! YOU PROBABLY SUCK BALLS AS WELL. So go and find a faggit website and release yourself of your stress.
39.
12 Nov 2009, 10:45 BST

I agree. "EnemyMine" has got no clue. I vote HD2!!!!!!!
40.
12 Nov 2009, 16:15 BST

It's painfully obvious the novices and retarded sheep have hurt feelings over the overrated hd2 being an inferior piece of crap when compared to the n900. The n900 is the obvious choice for power users who are computer savvy and want to do more. Heh @ "more superior" Everything that angry 'lol' fool types is failure.
41.
12 Nov 2009, 16:53 BST

REVIEWER: "The N900 scores poorly in design and it's not the prettiest of devices on the market. The phone comes only in black and resembles an old-fashioned cigarette pack and is missing the sleekness of other smartphones." AT LEAST THE REVIEWER GOT SOMETHING RIGHT. IT'S A FUC..... UGLY PHONE!!!!!!!!!
42.
13 Nov 2009, 09:18 BST

"website and release yourself of your stress" i think you mean 'relieve' anyway.... not goin to waste anymore time on you. As i said as for looks the Droid is far uglier than any of the phones here ppl have to admit that. the HTC looks decent (as i said) jus too big. HTC is as good as its OS... which is not very good at all. WinMo OS is lame and un-surprising... running out of memory in operation? wow how cool.
43.
14 Nov 2009, 00:37 BST

Obviously am getting the HD2. Though I must point out, N900 is far finer than the Droid. The droid looks ugly. Check out the HTC HD2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0f54DmA4Os
44.
14 Nov 2009, 07:34 BST

see it dont take glasses to see the droid is ugly..
45.
15 Nov 2009, 06:54 BST

I seriously doubt, the author truly supports the N900 at all. I think he rates the HTC HD2 as the winner. In his “review” , he repeats the well known awesome facts about the HD2. And then he keeps on taking about the insufficient browser and his dislike of WinMo. As mentioned in postings above, he should know that the default browser is opera and supports multitouch (and is faster than safari). And Win Mo is covered to 99% by HTC`s Sense UI (and is very well adapted, the only problem with WinMo). And I also never heard about any lags in performances, quit the contrary. I think I join the author with that rating and go for the HD2. I want to spare myself an e-book reader. But it’s a really tough decision….
46.
15 Nov 2009, 18:35 BST

WinMo sux, thats the only reason i dont like the HTC HD2... Android ftw.
47.
17 Nov 2009, 07:29 BST

NOKIA N900 AND THATS IT ....the phones are nokia and others ....so shut up .......
48.
17 Nov 2009, 11:12 BST

Ok. I have to admit. I was wrong and a total dick. The HD2 is a better phone than the N900, actually much better. I always had a Nokia. So this is a good time to change. Nokia is crap. Don't buy it ever. And sorry for being such an asshole. I get like that sometimes to prove a point. That's why I don't have any friends. If anyone maybe wants to meet up, please let me know. I would love for some company. If you know what I mean. HTC HD2 - Best smartphone ever!!
49.
17 Nov 2009, 18:12 BST

The above comment is what happen when ppl get desperate. i did not write that. REALLY... are you that stupid and desperate? why dont u buy the HD and leave other ppl to buy what they want. "if anyone wants to meet me" LOL such a loser. and for the record (1) i got the N900 (2) didnt tell anybody else what to get.
50.
17 Nov 2009, 18:36 BST

wow some a you HD assholes are really relentless (and like the lonely imposter really pathetic)... no facts to debate jus "please buy the HD cause i said so" why dont you talk about the fact that for all that screen real estate the HD packs it has the same resolution as the n900 and whats worse... the HD has a 64k colour screen. thats disgraceful for a brand new high end phone. the in store tech guy said "u can see a bit of colour banding on some photos where the screen doesnt display enough colour variations to match the fading". The pictures and video are sharper and look better on the n900's 800x480pixel 16M colour screen. The huge size of the HD screen doesnt account for much.
51.
17 Nov 2009, 18:40 BST

comment 48* HAHAHAHAHA.... your such a bitch. ppl can buy what they want. when u have to stoop trying to copy someone it shows u just dont have anythingof value to say. why not get some facts or just simply shut the fuck up and go buy what u want "Enemy has"
52.
18 Nov 2009, 09:22 BST

I think everyone has missed the point here. The comments you are submitting are suppose to help people to make the right choice on choosing a Smartphone. But people have got really ugly. I don’t like the comments “EnemyMine, lol and Korin” used. Come one guys, why the foul language. I can’t believe anything anyone said, just because you got personal. So I did some research on my own.. And no, I don’t have to give you a reason how I made my choice, but here are some. By reading endless of reviews and playing on my friends new HD2, there is only on choice. I loved the big screen and the speed of the processor. You don’t even notice the WinMo OS because of the HTC software. Yes, I will need to buy extra memory, but it’s worth it. Can’t see any logic buying the N900 just because it has more memory. I couldn’t get enough of the HD2. I haven’t had a N900 in my hands yet, so it’s difficult for me to give comments. But by reading all the reviews and comparing the specs, I couldn’t see any reason to choose the N900 above the HD2. So I’m going for the HTC. Good luck to all the N900 guys out there, not sure if you have done your homework probably. We will probably only know in a few months time what Smartphone came with the fewest problems. My bet is the HD2 will be voted the best Smartphone of the year, and kick the iPhone 3GS of its chair.
53.
20 Nov 2009, 08:19 BST

i want Korin by the way ;)
54.
24 Nov 2009, 07:53 BST

Ok, guys enough of the lousy language and name calling. Forums are much better understood when people are civil. now here's my opinion, and understand that its an opinion, I am not forcing anything. yes, HTC HD2 might look like a better device, and is a better device, but the fact of the matter is that it attempts to hide WinMo underneath. Issue is that you have software UI to cover up another software UI, and you end up using more RAM and processing just to achieve that. I will not comment on the droid, because I've never seen it, nor have bothered to mess with it 'yet.' The fact about the display in the N900 and HD2 mentioned earlier is very valid, c'mon 64K today? The fact about the 1GHZ processor on a cellphone is again very valid. Overkill, basically running all that juice to cover up the WinMo OS. Don't worry about applications with the N900, even before the release of the N900, the number of applications and ported applications jumped from around 10 to over a 100 now, and the phone's barely been released. As for reliability and processing power, please look up the N900 multitasking video, and you will find the n900 running nearly 28-30 applications without a hiccup. It is definitely an advantage when you have a separate graphics processor taking care of graphics, so even though the N900 might only have 600Mhz processor onboard, it gives you better battery life, but also doesn't have to bother itself with running intensive graphics calculations. AFAIK, the Opera browser still has issues with flash content, while the N900 uses a mozilla browser that is now even compatible with the latest flash version. So pages render exactly the way they should. Yeah, the phone may be bulky, but it has reason for the bulk with a 32G drive, 5mp camera, GPS, multiple frequency radios, nearly 7 or 8 different frequencies, and more... Personally, I prefer a heavier device, because in my jeans pockets a lighter device like the iphone feels like its going to snap. And unfortunately many have had that problem with the iphone. Just do your own research on the devices, with plenty of visual info from youtube.
55.
24 Nov 2009, 14:12 BST

If you have awesome hardware and put winmo on it the suckage factor of winmo will make the phone utter crap. I'd rather go with Maemo.
57.
26 Nov 2009, 13:48 BST

Hi. About the 3rd party applications, see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVR8yCzuHK0
58.
30 Nov 2009, 20:57 BST

Keep Dreaming...Droid kicks ass....
59.
4 Dec 2009, 12:29 BST

I've read and heard that Microsoft probably will release WM 7.0 in februari 2010 and that a free update will be available for the HTC HD2. Compare both Nokia and HTC again when WM 7.0 is out! I've heard WM 7.0 is made for multitasking an pinch-zooming. If only the lack of WM 6.5 is why HTC lost this battle, then in feb 2010 all will be different.
60.
4 Dec 2009, 20:51 BST

the fact is simply, HTC is cheaply made, thats why they can never have good camera quality they always are adding on poor quality lenses. as for Nokia, sure they could have whacked a 1ghz processor in, but they would rather wait and release one at a later date to cash in. You cant give someone everything otherwise nobody would buy anything new from you!. N900 wins for me, Motorola Milestone is a good runner up though, but lacks memory of n900 and is 50hz slower (doubt makes a difference)..and im not really a buyer of Android OS. Plus cam isnt as good as n900. if you wana respond back please feel free.
61.
15 Dec 2009, 23:20 BST

Just one thing guys- In June/July 2010, apple will announce the new iphone(the ultra slim design on which apple is supposed to be working on) as well the new iphone OS n then all of ur so called smartphones or mobile computers will automatically trace their way to the dustbins. The previous iphone users will receive the updates (like HTML5, which is considered to be better than flash n is open source, that means more apps) free of cost (n will hv their iphones as good as the new one) while companies like nokia, HTC, Motorola, etc. will be forced to dump their previous models (which, probably would be in ur pockets) to create a new iphone killer. So the lesson learned is, “iphone will always hold its crown, not matter what!” BTW, can any of these 3 phones beat iDisk on the iphone? .... Naaa, I don’t think so
62.
19 Dec 2009, 03:14 BST

1ghz Snapdragon(HD2) is INFERIOR to the ARM cortex A8 600mhz(n900) BECAUSE the ARM cortex(n900) has a built in GPU CPU...the two work together to beat the solo CPU snapdragon plus, FULL FLASH SUPPORT MAKES APPS USELESS BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE FULL INTERNET
63.
20 Dec 2009, 18:32 BST

Smart phone is a smart phone. I have a droid and I love it. Just be glad you can afford one
64.
28 Dec 2009, 13:44 BST

So much bad blood in here that am even sacred to tell the truth. What we all need now is someone who has used all three to clarify us. My idea of a smartphone for now is one without win-mo, 4'', plays almost every video & audio format, allows bluetooth connectivity for sharing files, allows java, has a physical keyboard (preferably push ups), runs a browser that features the latest adobe flash player, 5mp, 32gb, a stable os with a huge collection of useful apps (preferably free or not to expensive), nice ui, widgets, usb charging through a computer, long battery life, capacitive touchscreen, metal body. Price tag btw $500 - $700 (but the cheaper, the sweeter), wifi, multitasking, very fast processor, pdf viewer, doc viewer and editors, & of course can make calls & receive sms. Let's just call it a better Iphone without all those silly security measures that has made it impossible for me to fall in love with it. We can also wait to see if the first phone running maemo 6 has got it all. Anybody wanna sell an ipod touch 16gb 3rd or 2nd gen (preferably 3rd gen) holla me @ franklampard082@gmail.com
65.
29 Dec 2009, 21:10 BST

I was almost about to buy Nokia N900 but went for HTC HD2 just for that huge ass screen and 1 Gig Processor. Win MO seemed ok till i use the camera. The application becomes sluggish and when i try to capture any videos it freezes or gives out that popular windows error. Images have a pink hue in almost all of the pics. I read that HTC will provide a free upgrade to Win MO 7? How true is that?
71.
28 Feb 2010, 11:51 BST

soo many retards that talk on here and speak their retarded mind...what faggot goes on here complains about the author stating the n900 looks horrible and then whines about the look of the droid and it's "lip"..i mean really? shovel out the sand homo..who gives a fuck..it's a fuckin phone. also..there isn't any device better that has android os...the nexus one has the same worthless processor as hd2..it's a few seconds faster...omg!!! and the physical kb's..whoopee..the droids on screen is still by far the best. you guys cry about this guy being bias toward n900..but read back..and tell me what did he even write as being bad about the droid?..i think he mentioned like 1 thing..while for the other phones he mentioned atleast 4 items...soo ya..that seems messed up in my opinion.

Post Your Comment

*Name


advertisement
advertisement

Real Time Economic & Market Headlines

Ransquawk news

More Real-time news »

More Technology
Google said on Monday it remained in talks with the Chinese government about censorship of its Chinese-language search portal, despite mounting signs the...
Talks with China over censorship have reached an apparent impasse and Google, the world's largest search engine, is now "99.9 percent" certain to shut it...
The ongoing battle between Adobe Flash and HTML is set to come to the fore of web development this year as hardware manufacturers choose which OS/web plu...

 
 
IBTimes © 2010 The IBTimes Company Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Partners