Alex Jones Declares War on Candace Owens; Claims Deep State, Democratic Party, CIA and MI6 Are 'Behind Her'

Alex Jones, the incendiary conspiracy theorist and Infowars founder notorious for railing against so-called global elites, has now publicly declared 'war' on conservative commentator Candace Owens, unleashing a blistering tirade in which he accused her of being backed by the 'deep state', the Democratic Party and Western intelligence agencies including the CIA and MI6.

The explosive claims, delivered during a recent broadcast, represent a dramatic escalation in rhetoric and have ignited a fierce online backlash across political media spaces, with supporters and critics alike reacting in disbelief.

Jones Escalates Rhetoric With 'War' Language

In a viral clip posted by @YaakovRenewed, an account with roughly 12,100 followers that has racked up more than 548,000 views and nearly 900 shares, Alex Jones framed the dispute as both a personal betrayal and an ideological showdown, telling listeners he was bracing himself for a sustained confrontation.

Jones said he had previously trusted Candace Owens, but now believed he had 'dropped the ball' by failing to investigate her sooner. He apologised to his audience for that lapse before branding Owens a 'globalist agent', language that signalled a decisive rupture rather than a routine disagreement between commentators.

The choice of the word 'war', Jones insisted, was deliberate and not figurative. He directly challenged both Owens' critics and her supporters, claiming that threats and attempts to intimidate him had only strengthened his resolve.

Casting the moment as a pivotal turning point, Jones urged opponents to 'get ready', a warning that intensified concern over how far the clash could escalate and underscored the increasingly volatile tone of the feud.

Allegations Involving Intelligence Agencies and Political Parties

Central to Jones' claims was the assertion that Owens works with, or is supported by, shadowy power structures he referred to collectively as the 'deep state'.

He went further by naming the Democratic Party and two intelligence agencies, the CIA and Britain's MI6, as being 'behind her'.

Jones did not present evidence to substantiate these allegations. His statements were framed as personal conclusions drawn from what he described as a pattern of behaviour rather than documented proof.

No official response has been issued by any of the organisations named, and there is no publicly available information supporting Jones' claims.

References to Doxxing and Retaliation

In his remarks, Jones also referenced doxxing and online attacks, suggesting he was prepared to withstand and respond to them.

He claimed that pressure tactics used against him had only escalated the situation, likening the moment to an awakening rather than a deterrent.

Such language has drawn attention because it moves beyond ideological critique into the territory of personal confrontation.

Media analysts note that invoking retaliation and naming intelligence agencies represents a significant escalation compared with previous disputes within the same political ecosystem.

Why This Feud Stands Out

Public disagreements among high-profile conservative figures are not uncommon, but this episode differs in tone and scope.

By alleging foreign and domestic intelligence involvement, Jones expanded the narrative beyond a personal falling-out into a sweeping conspiracy framework.

The explicit admission that he once trusted Owens, followed by a complete reversal, adds to the intensity of the story. It suggests a fracture that Jones himself has framed as irreversible, rather than a disagreement that might fade with time.

Reaction and Current Status

At the time of writing, Owens has not issued a public response to Jones' statements. Social media reaction has been swift and polarised, with supporters on both sides amplifying clips and excerpts from the broadcast.

The episode continues to trend online as audiences search for clarity on what prompted the sudden escalation and whether further statements will follow.

For now, the claims remain unverified allegations made by Jones, with no corroborating evidence or official comment from those named.