'Complicit' Taylor Swift Draws Criticism for Not Joining Sabrina Carpenter, Olivia Rodrigo in Condemning White House
'I'm sorry. What is the excuse?' TikToker asked Taylor Swift for remaining silent after the White House used her song in its TikTok video.

Taylor Swift is facing renewed criticism for her lack of public response after the White House used one of her songs in a promotional video. The silence has drawn sharp comparisons to other major artists, like Sabrina Carpenter and Olivia Rodrigo, who immediately demanded their music be removed from similar content.
This placed a spotlight on Swift, with observers noting why the pop superstar has not voiced opposition or taken action. The White House TikTok video featuring her 'The Fate of Ophelia' track remains online. This fact has renewed discussion about Swift's lack of reaction after the recent incident involving the Please Please Please hitmaker.
What's the Excuse, Taylor Swift?
TikTok creator Kahlen Barry is among those who have called out Taylor Swift for her silence over a month since the White House used her track to promote Donald Trump's administration. In a video, Barry contrasted Swift's lack of reaction with the immediate public statements from Sabrina Carpenter and Olivia Rodrigo after the White House used their songs in videos promoting ICE.
'So if you're still defending Taylor Swift and the way that she's been moving with this current administration, I know something about you,' Barry began. The creator pointed out that Swift is a much bigger star than Carpenter and Rodrigo combined, yet she has remained silent.
'So at this point, I'm sorry. What is the excuse?' Barry asked. 'What is the excuse for Taylor Swift, who is more powerful than both of them, honestly, combined?' Barry expressed disbelief at Swift's silence, particularly given her public battle for ownership of her music, only to be 'complicit when people are using her music to fuel a very disgusting and harmful agenda.'
@kahlenbarry Sabrina Carpenter has spoken up while Taylor Swift remains complicit. It is clear through Sabrina and Olivia that it’s not hard to stand up and they have far less power. #taylorswift #sabrinacarpenter #oliviarodrigo
♬ original sound - Kahlen Barry
A Contrast in Responses
When Olivia Rodrigo and Sabrina Carpenter discovered the White House was using their songs, they both issued swift and forceful public rebukes.
'Don't ever use my songs to promote your racist, hateful propaganda,' Rodrigo reportedly wrote in a since-deleted comment on a video promoting self-deportation. Shortly after, the audio on the video was removed.
Carpenter had a similar reaction after her song 'Juno' was used to promote ICE deportations. She called the video 'Evil and Disgusting' and stated, 'Do Not Involve Me in Your Inhumane Agenda.' The White House subsequently deleted that video.
The TikTok video using Swift's song, 'The Fate of Ophelia,' remains accessible. The White House used a clip of the song, ending the video with the caption 'The fate of America.'
@whitehouse OUR VIBES 🇺🇸
♬ original sound - The White House
History of Public Feud
The silence surprised many, given Taylor Swift's public feud with Donald Trump. In her 2020 documentary Miss Americana, her publicist warned her that Trump might come after her for speaking out politically, to which she replied, 'F**k that. I don't care.'
Swift later endorsed Kamala Harris in the 2024 national election. In response, Trump reportedly took to social media and wrote, 'I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT.'
This history led many to assume Swift would immediately demand that the White House remove her track. However, to their dismay she hasn't issued any statement about it.
© Copyright IBTimes 2025. All rights reserved.





















