Erika Kirk Calls Anti-ICE Protests 'Demonic'—Critics Say She's Projecting Fears
Charlie Kirk's widow faces backlash for controversial remarks on anti-ICE demonstrations

Erika Kirk has sparked intense public backlash after calling nationwide anti-ICE protests 'demonic' and claiming they could destroy the country. The comments, made during a speaking engagement in Riverside, California, on 21 January, drew swift criticism on social media, with many accusing her of projecting her own fears onto peaceful demonstrators.
Speaking as part of her Make Heaven Crowded tour, Kirk shared her views on recent protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). 'Personally, I do not [think they are helping]. I think it's demonic. What they think can change this nation... actually destroy[s] it,' she told the audience, according to OK Magazine. Critics have questioned whether her dramatic language reflects genuine concern or performative outrage, with some suggesting she is exploiting her platform following the death of her husband, Charlie Kirk, in September 2025.
Public Ridicule and Criticism
The backlash intensified as observers highlighted the contrast between Kirk's dramatic warnings and the real motivations of protestors. Many suggested her words reflected projection rather than fact, with one individual writing on X: 'The pot always calling the kettle black.'
One user on X wrote: 'ICE is demonic. And they will all be going to h---,' whilst another remarked: 'She must be projecting,' reflecting widespread perception that Kirk's statements were more about her own concerns than the protests themselves.
Critics also scrutinised Kirk's frequent public appearances following her husband's death. Some accused her of using the platform for personal gain, with one person posting: 'I'd dare to say grifting in the name of God is what is demonic.'
Context of Anti-ICE Protests
Kirk's comments came amid heightened protests following two fatal incidents involving ICE agents. Renée Good was shot during an ICE operation in Minnesota, and Alex Pretti was killed days later whilst recording officers during a separate protest.
The tragedies sparked nationwide demonstrations, drawing attention to ICE practices and public safety concerns. Whilst Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem defended the officers' actions, stating that Pretti 'attacked those officers, had a weapon on him, and multiple dozens of rounds of ammunition', public outrage has continued.
Observers argue that protests are a response to perceived overreach and violence, rather than a threat to the country.
Accusations of Political Motivations
Some commentators accused Kirk of aligning with President Donald Trump and exploiting her platform for political and financial gain. According to OK! Magazine, critics said: 'What's demonic is the way she is willing to sell out her husband's legacy, to be a shill for Donald Trump, in return for $$$.'
Despite the ridicule, Kirk has not retracted her statements, underscoring the polarising nature of debates over immigration enforcement and public protests in the United States.
Media Response
The response to Kirk's remarks highlights a broader cultural divide, with commentators questioning whether her dramatic language reflects genuine concern or performative outrage. Social media users continue to lampoon her statements, turning the controversy into a viral moment that blends political critique with humour and disbelief.
Many media outlets have emphasised the stark contrast between Kirk's warnings of a 'demonic' uprising and the largely peaceful nature of the protests. Analysts noted that whilst her rhetoric captures headlines, it risks overshadowing the real concerns of communities affected by ICE operations.
By exaggerating threats, critics argue, such statements often inflame division and divert attention from serious policy discussions, making Kirk a target for ridicule more than reasoned debate.
© Copyright IBTimes 2025. All rights reserved.





















