Women in Burka
A 76-year-old anti-migrant protester has appeared in court wearing a burka after being charged with concealing his identity at a Portsmouth demonstration Faruk Tokluoğlu/Representation photo via Pexels

A 76-year-old man charged with wearing a burka to conceal his identity during an anti-migrant protest has appeared in court wearing the same garment. He claimed he is studying Islam and wants to gain a better understanding of the religion.

Timothy Miller, from Hedge End, Hampshire, appeared at Portsmouth Magistrates' Court on 14 October to contest the charge relating to a demonstration held in Portsmouth on 12 September. His decision to wear the full-body covering to the hearing drew attention as he attempted to argue that his actions at the protest were protected by a religious exemption.

'I Am Studying Islam'

During the hearing, District Judge Stephen Apted asked Miller to lift his face covering so court officials could confirm his identity. The pensioner raised the veil while holding a black handbag and provided his name, date of birth and address.

When asked how he pleaded to the charge, Miller replied: 'As I am in every police camera, I am not guilty.'

He argued that he had not been attempting to hide his identity, pointing to the presence of police cameras and overhead drones during the demonstration. He also claimed that he had informed officers that he believed he qualified for an exemption relating to religious observance.

Miller told the court that he was studying Islam and had chosen to wear the garment to gain a 'greater understanding' of the faith. He described his interest as part of an ongoing process of exploring different religions.

When questioned about whether he followed Islam, he initially resisted answering directly, arguing that people should not be questioned about their religion. He later explained that he was studying the faith because he believed it was becoming increasingly relevant in Britain.

Protest Arrest Sparks Legal Test

Miller was arrested following an anti-immigration demonstration in Portsmouth city centre on 12 September, when police used powers restricting face coverings in a designated area. The restrictions were introduced amid protests involving anti-migrant demonstrators and counter-protesters. Police had warned that they could arrest people wearing face coverings in circumstances covered by the law.

Miller was subsequently charged with wearing or using an item to conceal his identity at a protest. The case centres on whether his use of the burka fell within the law's provisions and whether the religious-observance exemption he claims applies to his circumstances.

The charge does not amount to a finding of guilt, and Miller has denied the allegation.

Court Orders Further Evidence for His Defence

Miller represented himself at the hearing and told the court he was crowdfunding to pay for legal representation at trial. He also argued that people should be treated equally under the law, saying: 'The issue quite simply is we should be all living under one law of which I think everybody is under agreement.'

The judge adjourned the case and released Miller on unconditional bail. His trial is scheduled to take place at Portsmouth Magistrates' Court on 16 February 2027. The judge also said the defence would need to produce a report supporting Miller's argument that a man considering converting to Islam could wear a burka in public to better understand the religion and make an informed decision about observing it.

For now, the case remains unresolved. Miller's appearance in court in the same garment at the centre of the charge has brought renewed attention to the dispute over face-covering restrictions, religious exemptions and the limits of what constitutes concealing one's identity at a public demonstration.