3I/ATLAS Warning: Harvard’s Avi Loeb Claims Comet Carries WWI Chemical
An impression of a rocky and water-rich asteroid being torn apart by the strong gravity of the white dwarf star GD 61. NASA Hubble Space Telescope/Unsplash

Humanity's encounter with interstellar object 3I/ATLAS has veered from astronomical curiosity into the centre of a scientific quandary that challenges long-held assumptions about cosmic visitors.

3I/ATLAS, detected moving through our solar system from beyond in July 2025, is only the third interstellar object ever observed. Its discovery by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) survey generated immediate global scientific interest due to its hyperbolic trajectory and high velocity.

Scientists anticipated that 3I/ATLAS would behave like other known comets, yet recent measurements and the prolonged lack of consistent radio data from deep-space observatories have forced experts to reassess their understanding of such objects and their implications for astrophysics.

Unprecedented Radio Observations And Resulting Confusion

Radio astronomers around the globe have trained some of the most sensitive dishes on 3I/ATLAS in the hope of detecting emissions that might illuminate its composition or indicate non-natural origins.

The MeerKAT radio telescope in South Africa reported what has been interpreted in scientific circles as the first radio emission associated with the object. These emissions arise from hydroxyl radicals (OH) in the comet's coma and are consistent with outgassing water molecules, a well-documented natural cometary phenomenon.

Scientists emphasised that these radio signatures are absorption features created by natural molecules rather than coherent signals of technological origin. This distinction is a cornerstone of interpreting radio data in astronomy, and it has been confirmed by both mainstream research and projects such as Breakthrough Listen, which explicitly searched for potential 'technosignatures' without success.

Nevertheless, the initial absence of continuous, targeted radio data from major space agencies stirred confusion. Periods of silence from institutions like NASA, particularly during government administrative pauses, left gaps in public communication that speculative communities filled with hypotheses ranging from unusual comet behaviour to engineered origin.

Despite these claims, none of them are supported by peer-reviewed evidence or direct astrophysical data.

Scientific Evidence Favouring Natural Origins

Contrary to some sensational interpretations, the growing body of observational data paints 3I/ATLAS as an extraordinary yet natural interstellar comet.

Infrared spectroscopy performed by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) revealed that the comet's coma, the cloud of gas and dust surrounding its nucleus, is unusually rich in carbon dioxide (CO2) relative to water. This high CO2/H2O ratio is among the most extreme ever seen in a comet and suggests unique formation conditions in its parent star system.

Optical and spectroscopic measurements collected by ground-based telescopes, coordinated through international observatories, consistently show characteristics typical of cometary activity, such as dust production and sublimation of volatile ices under solar heating. These data align with established patterns observed in both solar system and interstellar comets.

Additionally, the object's trajectory, a hyperbolic path that ensures it will never orbit the Sun but will instead depart our solar system after its brief visit, confirms its status as an interstellar wanderer. This behaviour mirrors that of its predecessors, 1I/'Oumuamua and 2I/Borisov, although 3I/ATLAS's physical characteristics differ in composition and activity profile.

Independent teams have also integrated data, including light curves, spectral indices, and dust production rates that further support the interpretation of 3I/ATLAS as a comet formed under conditions outside our solar system.

Debate Within The Scientific Community

Despite broad consensus among astronomers that 3I/ATLAS behaves like a natural comet, the object's unusual attributes, such as its CO2-rich coma and the strength of its outgassing, have ignited serious debate in specialised forums.

Some researchers, including influential figures in astrophysics, have publicly stated that certain anomalies warrant open consideration of non-traditional explanations, without claiming definitive evidence of alien technology. For example, one respected astrophysicist has assessed a likelihood that some observed features sit outside current cometary models, sparking discussion about how interstellar objects might defy expectations based on limited samples.

This debate underscores a broader truth in science: anomalies do not instantly become evidence of intelligent origins, but they highlight the limits of existing models when applied to rare phenomena. The scientific method demands that extraordinary claims be supported by extraordinary data, and so far, detailed measurements, including radio, optical, and spectroscopic observations, confirm natural processes.

Public fascination, meanwhile, has grown as livestreams, live data feeds from observatories, and amateur astronomy networks allowed unprecedented access to real-time observations, magnifying both accurate information and speculative narratives.

The Critical Importance Of Direct Data Over Speculation

In the absence of direct evidence pointing towards an artificial origin, the case of 3I/ATLAS illustrates the vital role of robust, transparent scientific measurement.

Astronomical instruments from NASA, ESA, and ground-based observatories have systematically gathered data and made it available to the global research community. Peer-reviewed studies continue to expand understanding of this interstellar visitor, revealing details about its chemical makeup, jet dynamics, and evolution as it passes through our solar system.

Meanwhile, speculative claims, while often rooted in curiosity, lack verifiable, primary documentation and have not been published in established scientific journals nor corroborated by credible data from the relevant observing facilities.

The story of 3I/ATLAS reveals not an engineered probe but an astonishing natural object that has already enriched human knowledge of the cosmos.