Republicans Demand Tim Walz Quit as Minnesota Fraud Scandal Nears Jaw-Dropping $9 Billion
GOP lawmakers say Walz lost billions as calls for accountability get louder

Shock waves are rippling through Minnesota politics after Republican lawmakers publicly demanded the resignation of Democratic Governor Tim Walz, accusing him of presiding over one of the largest fraud scandals in the state's history. With estimates suggesting that up to $9 billion (£6.66 million) in public funds may have been stolen or misused during his tenure, critics say patience has run out and accountability is overdue.
Constitution Cited But No Recall Launched
While Walz's office insists reforms were made and oversight strengthened, the controversy has ignited a fierce debate about leadership, responsibility and trust in government.
Several Republican lawmakers in Minnesota have formally called on Democratic Governor Tim Walz to resign, citing what they describe as years of unchecked fraud within state administered social service programmes.
In a joint statement released Monday, state Senators Bill Lieske and Nathan Wesenberg, alongside Representatives Marj Fogelman, Drew Roach and Mike Wiener, said Minnesotans have grown increasingly frustrated as the scale of the alleged fraud has continued to expand.
'Minnesotans have been watching the fraud crisis get worse and worse for years,' the lawmakers said, adding that 'it has gone on long enough.'
The group stressed that their demand was not politically motivated, noting that they had previously given the governor time to respond to the growing concerns.
'This is not about politics or stunts,' the statement read. 'The office of the governor deserves respect.'
Their call follows testimony from First Assistant US Attorney Joe Thompson, who revealed that as much as half of the $18 billion (£13.33 billion) distributed through 14 Medicaid waiver programmes during Walz's administration may have been fraudulent.
While the legislators stopped short of launching a formal recall effort, they pointed to Article 8, Section 6 of the Minnesota Constitution, which allows for the removal of executive officials in cases of serious malfeasance or nonfeasance.
They argued that Walz had failed to act despite repeated warning signs.
'Leadership means doing the right thing even when it is difficult,' the lawmakers said, calling the situation 'billions of dollars in fraud that should have gone to vulnerable Minnesotans.'
The statement also accused the governor of neglecting his duty to oversee state programmes as the alleged fraud continued to grow.
'The red flags were everywhere,' they said, adding that 'year after year, nothing changed.'
FBI Involvement and National Debate Fuel Pressure
Fuel was added to the controversy as federal authorities confirmed they are ramping up investigations in Minnesota. The FBI has already dismantled a major fraud scheme involving federal food aid during the COVID period, with officials warning that the case may be only a small part of a much larger problem.
The issue has also sparked a wider national debate. Vice President JD Vance has described the cases as a microcosm of broader problems in the system, while others caution against conflating criminal investigations with questions of nationality or community.
For Republicans calling on Walz to resign, the focus remains firmly on leadership and accountability. They argue that regardless of who committed the fraud, the responsibility to prevent and respond to it ultimately rests with the governor.
As investigations deepen and political pressure mounts, the question at the centre of the headline remains unanswered. Will Tim Walz weather the storm, or will the growing scandal force a dramatic turning point in Minnesota's political leadership?
© Copyright IBTimes 2025. All rights reserved.




















