Charlie Kirk
Charlie Kirk's shooting case sees Tyler Robinson's defence arguing against the death penalty, claiming the attack targeted only Kirk as the court considers whether the crime meets Utah's capital offence criteria Gage Skidmore/Flickr CC BY-SA 4.0

The legal team for Tyler Robinson, the man accused of fatally shooting conservative activist Charlie Kirk, claimed the shooter solely struck the 'intended target' as they argued that the case should not qualify for the death penalty.

Appearing before Judge Tony Graf in Provo, the 23-year-old former electrical apprentice awaited a ruling on whether prosecutors had established probable cause for the case to proceed to trial.

During the five-day preliminary hearing in July, prosecutors presented evidence in support of the aggravated murder charge and argued that the shooting knowingly created a great risk of death to others.

To counter the prosecution's claim that the incident meets the threshold for an aggravated capital offence, Robinson's defence insists the shooting was focused solely on the 31-year-old Kirk without threatening the wider university crowd.

Aggravated Murder Charges and the Kirk Case Death Penalty Dispute

The legal debate centres on how the state of Utah defines a capital crime. Prosecutors described the evidence presented at the preliminary hearing as 'overwhelming', including DNA test results that prosecutors say link Robinson to the suspected murder weapon.

Proving Robinson pulled the trigger, however, is only part of the prosecution's task. They must also establish probable cause for the aggravating factor that the shooter knowingly created a great risk of death to someone other than Kirk.

Defence lawyers reject this legal framing. By arguing that the shooting exclusively targeted an intended victim rather than endangering the broader public, they hope to keep the death penalty off the table.

Prosecutors have also alleged that Robinson was motivated by Kirk's political views on transgender rights and same-sex marriage.

This alleged political motivation serves as another potential avenue for prosecutors in their arguments.

Robinson's attorneys have argued that the prosecution has not established evidence that he was motivated by Kirk's political views.

Judge Graf Prepares Crucial Ruling for Tyler Robinson

Tuesday's proceedings began with legal discussions. Ahead of the closing arguments, Judge Graf ordered a sealed morning session at the request of the defence, a move that appeared to centre on whether cameras would be permitted inside the courtroom.

Following this closed-door discussion, the judge prepared to hear up to four hours of statements from both sides.

Once arguments conclude, Graf is expected to rule on whether probable cause exists to push the case forward to a full trial. If Graf finds probable cause, an arraignment could follow. As of this hearing, the suspect has yet to enter a formal plea.

The victim's family has maintained a consistent presence throughout the judicial proceedings.

Erika Kirk, who took on the role of Turning Point USA's CEO and board chair following the death of her husband, previously attended the extensive July hearing and publicly expressed forgiveness for her husband's alleged attacker during a memorial service.

She has not said whether she believes the state should pursue the death penalty.

Erika Kirk was expected to attend Tuesday's hearing alongside her late husband's parents. While legal teams argue over statutory definitions, the family waits to see if the man accused of the fatal shooting will formally stand trial.

Writer's pick