Prince William and Prince Harry
Gareth Fuller/POOL

In the ever-shifting landscape of the British monarchy, the question of identity has always been as much about survival as it is about prestige. As the New Year of 2026 dawns, the shadow of Prince Andrew's unceremonious title removal still looms large over the House of Windsor.

For many, it has sparked a recurring and uncomfortable question: could Prince Harry and Meghan Markle be next?

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have now spent over five years carving out a distinct, albeit controversial, life in California. At 41 and 44 respectively, Harry and Meghan have raised their children—Archie, now six, and Lilibet, four—far from the gilded constraints of Frogmore Cottage.

Yet, despite the distance and the distinct lack of 'HRH' styling in their official public branding, the couple remains tethered to the institution by their titles. It is a connection that some experts believe is on 'borrowed time'.

The Prince William Strategy: Purpose Over Petulance

As King Charles continues to champion a 'slimmed down' monarchy to ensure the institution's longevity and reduce costs for the taxpayer, the focus naturally shifts to his heir.

Prince William, the Prince of Wales, is widely seen as the architect of the monarchy's future, and his relationship with his younger brother is, at best, described as an impasse.

The two have reportedly not spoken since the funeral of Queen Elizabeth II, and the last year has seen a series of 'significant diary clashes' that saw the brothers competing for headlines on opposite sides of the Atlantic.

However, those expecting a dramatic 'letters patent' to strip Harry and Meghan of their princely status the moment William takes the throne may be disappointed. According to royal commentator Afua Acheampong-Hagan, the future King has 'much bigger fish to fry' than settling scores.

To many insiders, William is viewed as a leader who is laser-focused on high-impact, societal change rather than family feuds.

His flagship projects, such as Homewards—which aims to prove that ending homelessness in the UK is achievable—and the Earthshot Prize, are the true hallmarks of his vision. 'Taking away his brother and sister-in-law's titles as a priority would just make him look petty,' Acheampong-Hagan explains.

'I don't think he's got time to do that, and also, he doesn't want that to be the focus of his reign when it comes.'

A Narrative In Flux: The Human Cost Of The Sussex Title Row

While the debate over their status rages in London, the Sussexes are facing their own internal pressures in Montecito. The couple has faced a revolving door of staff, losing 11 advisors in just five years.

The most recent departure, PR chief Meredith Maines, concluded her work with Archewell at the end of 2025. In a statement, Maines noted she would be 'pursuing a new opportunity in 2026', marking the fifth key member of their publicity team to exit in the latter half of last year alone.

This 'staff exodus' has fuelled long-standing claims that the couple can be 'difficult' to work for, a narrative they have consistently pushed back against. But beyond the PR battles, there is a human element that is often lost in the tabloid noise.

Stripping a family of titles is not just a matter of ink on parchment; as seen with the Danish Royal Family in 2022, when Queen Margrethe II removed titles from four of her grandchildren, the emotional fallout can be devastating. Prince Joachim of Denmark noted at the time that his children found themselves in a situation they 'do not understand'.

For William, the precedent set by Denmark serves as a cautionary tale of family upset rather than an administrative blueprint. Modernising the monarchy, in his view, likely involves moving beyond the 'petty' and focusing on a legacy defined by service.

In the end, it may be that the Sussex titles are preserved not out of affection, but out of a shrewd, kingly desire to keep the focus where it truly belongs: on the future of Britain.