Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell Allegedly 'Hated' Each Other: Victim Claims Paedophile's 'Two-Inch' P***s Was 'Lemon-Shaped'

A woman who identifies herself as one of Jeffrey Epstein's victims has provided new testimony alleging that the late financier's anatomy was 'extremely deformed' and that his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell was marked by hostility rather than affection. The allegations were made by Rina Oh during a recent interview in which she discussed her encounters with Epstein and Maxwell and reflected on the wider implications of their association.

Oh Claims Epstein's Genitals Were 'Two Inches' and 'Lemon-Shaped'

Oh alleged that Epstein's penis measured around two inches (5cm) when erect, describing the shape as 'lemon-like', narrower at the tip and thicker at the base. A typical adult male erection in medical literature ranges between 5–6 inches (13–15cm), meaning the size she described is significantly below average and would constitute a major anatomical irregularity if accurate.

Her description resembles references made in earlier civil litigation, including testimony where Epstein was asked about having an 'egg-shaped' penis. Those proceedings, however, delivered no conclusion. Epstein's lawyers objected repeatedly to anatomical questioning, and no examination was conducted. Epstein died on 10/08/2019 at the age of 66, ending any possibility of verification.

Oh claimed that Epstein appeared sensitive about his anatomy and suggested this insecurity may have shaped elements of his behaviour. While no medical evidence supports this, she emphasised that a perceived deformity could have influenced the power dynamics he cultivated around himself.

Relationship Allegedly Marked by 'Mutual Contempt'

A significant part of Oh's testimony challenges the long-held public belief that Epstein and Maxwell shared a romantic partnership. Instead, she described a relationship built on conflict, resentment, and strategic cooperation. According to Oh, Maxwell frequently mocked Epstein's appearance and demeanour, allegedly ridiculing him in her British accent.

She claims their exchanges often involved belittlement rather than affection. In her account, this tension contributed to an atmosphere in which young women became subject to psychological manipulation. Oh does not provide numeric detail regarding the frequency of these alleged confrontations, but her descriptions frame them as regular occurrences rather than isolated incidents.

Her version of events contrasts sharply with the narrative presented by Epstein's legal team over the years, which emphasised a long-term partnership. Oh argues instead that their cooperation was functional and transactional, driven by power rather than emotional closeness.

Maxwell's Conviction Provides Legal Context

Maxwell's criminal conviction in 2021 remains the strongest validated element of the wider allegations surrounding Epstein. She was sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment for sex trafficking offences involving minors. The court heard that she played a central role in coordinating Epstein's abuse by identifying, recruiting, and grooming underage girls, some as young as 14.

Prosecutors described her as integral to Epstein's operations for at least a decade, citing travel logs, testimony, and financial records. This established timeline contextualises Oh's claims about the climate within Epstein's circle, even though her more specific allegations cannot be quantified or independently verified.

While Maxwell's conviction confirms her involvement in facilitating abuse, it does not validate the interpersonal dynamic or physical descriptions Oh provides. Those details rely entirely on survivor testimony, which is significant but not evidentially corroborated.

Lack of Forensic Evidence Leaves Key Claims Unverified

No forensic documents, coroner's findings, or medical records have publicly described Epstein's genitalia. The absence of medical examination at any stage, during earlier investigations, civil suits, or following his death, means allegations about his anatomy remain unverified.

The two-inch measurement provided by Oh is therefore contextual rather than confirmed. Her description underscores her personal experience but cannot be compared against verified records. The contrast between survivor accounts and the absence of physical evidence is central to understanding why such claims remain allegations rather than established fact.

Testimony Adds to Understanding of Abuse Dynamics

Although some numerical elements, such as the stated penis size, cannot be independently confirmed, Oh's account contributes to broader efforts to understand how Epstein and Maxwell exerted influence and control. The testimony suggests that psychological dominance, fuelled in part by their alleged internal conflicts, shaped the experience of many young women within their orbit.

Survivor evidence continues to be essential, especially in cases where the principal perpetrator is deceased. Epstein's death ended all opportunities for direct interrogation, forensic verification, or additional charges. Maxwell, now serving a two-decade sentence, is the only central figure remaining within the legal system.

Oh's testimony, alongside others, forms part of an evolving historical record. Even without full corroboration, such accounts help explain the mechanisms of coercion within Epstein's network and provide insight into the interpersonal dynamics that may have influenced one of the most notorious abuse systems of recent decades.