Royal Mail Under Fire for Insulting £750 Compensation for Lost £10,000 Gold
Senders urged to scrutinise fine print on insurance coverage caps

In the heart of 2025's postal crisis, Royal Mail ignites national outrage by offering a paltry £750 ($1,151) payout to Devon man Rob Hobson after misplacing his £10,000 ($15,342) gold bar sent via special delivery.
This inheritance heirloom, a 100g Britannia coin earmarked for Royal Mint buyback to bolster his pension, vanished en route, exposing glaring flaws in postal insurance limits and special delivery safeguards.
As public fury swells over lost parcel debacles and compensation shortfalls, Hobson's plight catalyses demands for urgent reforms in the UK's beleaguered mail sector, where misplaced valuables and inadequate protections erode consumer trust daily.
The Vanishing Heirloom: Hobson's Heartbreaking Loss
Rob Hobson, a Devon resident, meticulously packaged his late father's 100g gold Britannia bar—valued at £10,000 ($15,342)—for dispatch on or around 4 November 2025. Purchased as part of an inheritance, the gleaming asset headed to the Royal Mint for a buyback deal intended to secure Hobson's retirement future.
Opting for Royal Mail's special delivery service, he added extra insurance, believing it fortified against mishaps in this era of escalating parcel volumes. Yet, the package never materialised at its destination, plunging Hobson into despair as tracking yielded no clues. 'I bought a gold bar using money from my dad's inheritance,' Hobson lamented, underscoring the personal devastation beyond mere financial hit.
Royal Mail launched an investigation, but early signs point to internal handling errors amid strained operations. This incident, reported widely on 6 November 2025, highlights vulnerabilities in high-value shipments, urging senders to scrutinise fine print on coverage caps. Hobson's saga serves as a stark reminder: even premium services falter, leaving ordinary folk to bear extraordinary burdens in an unforgiving postal landscape.
Why £750 Stings So Severely
Despite Hobson's prudent purchase of enhanced protection, Royal Mail capped reimbursement at £750 ($1,151), a fraction of the bar's market worth, sparking accusations of predatory policy. The special delivery's insurance ceiling, unchanged for years, covers contents up to that limit regardless of declared value, a stipulation buried in terms that ensnare the unwary.
Experts decry this as outdated, especially with gold prices soaring in 2025's volatile markets, where a single bar equates to life-altering savings. Hobson rejects the offer outright, insisting on the asset's recovery: 'I don't want compensation. I want my gold back. Someone knows where it is,' he asserted, fuelling perceptions of institutional indifference.
This disparity—£750 ($1,151) versus £10,000 ($15,342)—exposes a systemic rift, where low payouts deter accountability and embolden negligence. As claimants multiply, calls intensify for tiered insurances aligned with inflation, ensuring fairness for those navigating Royal Mail's labyrinthine protocols.
Public Outcry Echoes Across the Nation
Hobson's ordeal reverberates through social media and news outlets, amplifying grievances in 2025's torrent of lost parcel complaints against Royal Mail. Metro UK posted on X on 10 November 2025: 'Fury as Royal Mail offers man £750 after losing £10,000 gold bar in post,' garnering thousands of views and igniting debates on postal reform.
Fury as Royal Mail offers man £750 after losing £10,000 gold bar in post https://t.co/grE24uQPQb
— Metro (@MetroUK) November 10, 2025
Reddit forums buzz with warnings: 'A warning to understand what postage insurance you are paying for,' users caution, sharing tales of similar shortfalls. Consumer advocates, via BBC analysis, spotlight how special delivery's £750 ($1,151) cap lags behind competitors' offerings, eroding faith in state-backed services. In Devon and beyond, locals rally behind Hobson, petitioning for investigations into systemic lapses amid rising thefts and delays.
This gold bar fiasco, intertwined with broader inheritance protection concerns, pressures regulators to overhaul limits, potentially averting future fiascos. As voices unite, the clamour underscores a pivotal truth: robust safeguards must evolve to shield everyday savers from postal pitfalls.
© Copyright IBTimes 2025. All rights reserved.





















