The Case for Danantara: From Sleeping Giants to Engines of Growth
Why confronting decades of SOE underperformance may be essential to Indonesia's 2045 growth ambitions

In recent months, discussion of Danantara Indonesia's work in its first year has dominated many of Jakarta's political and financial circles. Much of the attention has focused on reports highlighting longstanding challenges within the State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) now grouped under the wealth fund's umbrella, including technological gaps, institutional inertia, and operational inefficiencies.
These are not failures to assign blame to - they are precisely the issues Danantara exists to address. Under President Prabowo's Emas 2045 vision, where institutional reform is central, these early developments show a system working toward greater focus and discipline. Danantara's early interventions demonstrate a decisive effort to bring focus, discipline, and professional oversight to Indonesia's more than 1,000 SOEs, turning decades of hidden inefficiencies into clear opportunities for reform and modernisation at scale.
Some critics have treated the disappointing condition of some of Indonesia's SOEs as an indictment of Danantara itself. This is not just incorrect, it is also misguided. It blames the doctor for discovering the illness.
By exposing where these enterprises have underperformed, Danantara enables stronger governance, better capital allocation, and operational modernisation across a sector that holds a large share of the country's strategic assets and development potential. Far from being a problem, these revelations confirm the necessity of Danantara's mandate and the
urgency of its work.
For years, many of these enterprises operated more like state bureaucracies than commercial competitors. Governance was opaque, budget constraints soft, and competitive pressure limited. Incentives were shaped more by political considerations - employment guarantees, patronage networks, and administrative comfort - than by commercial logic. The result was not collapse, but stagnation: a gradual erosion of competitiveness in a national and global economy that increasingly rewards technological sophistication and managerial discipline.
Danantara is actively addressing this challenge. Its mandate is to consolidate oversight, strengthen governance, improve capital allocation, and create a clear separation between political priorities and commercial decision-making. By embedding transparency, financial discipline, and professional management across the state sector, it is converting latent potential into measurable performance. Danantara is not merely highlighting problems - it
is driving the transformation that makes Indonesia's SOEs engines of growth rather than institutional ballast.
The scale of the task is significant. Modernising more than a thousand enterprises, implementing professional investment frameworks, and integrating advanced technologies will take time. But, the alternative - maintaining outdated structures- would impose far higher long-term costs and undermine Indonesia's growth ambitions.
President Prabowo's Indonesia Emas 2045 vision demands more efficient and productive use of capital, rapid technological adoption, and disciplined investment across strategic sectors dominated by SOEs. In an era defined by artificial intelligence and digital transformation, enterprises that fail to develop risk permanently lag behind global peers. Scale alone is no guarantee of effectiveness; modernisation is essential.
International experience reinforces this imperative. Singapore's Temasek and Norway's restructuring of state energy sectors both began by exposing inefficiencies accumulated over decades. Those initial revelations were uncomfortable, but they produced institutions capable of competing globally and safeguarding national wealth. Indonesia now stands at a comparable inflection point.
Early findings should be understood not as a critique of Danantara, but as evidence of its effectiveness in identifying the reforms necessary for long-term success. By highlighting structural weaknesses, Danantara is laying the foundation for stronger governance, disciplined capital allocation, and technologically sophisticated operations.
The work is ongoing, but the trajectory is clear. Danantara is moving Indonesia's SOEs from dormant potential to active drivers of national growth. For a country determined to secure its place among the world's leading economies by 2045, this transformation is not merely desirable - it is essential.
© Copyright IBTimes 2025. All rights reserved.
























