Donald Trump
Donald Trump Instagram/realdonladtrump

The Twenty-Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution has surged back into public conversation after a burst of online activity by Donald Trump, who published 33 posts in 45 minutes, triggering renewed debate about presidential fitness and constitutional safeguards.

While no formal action has been initiated, the moment has pushed a rarely discussed provision of the Constitution into the spotlight, prompting questions about what the amendment actually does and when it can be used.

What Is the 25th Amendment?

Ratified in 1967, the 25th Amendment was designed to clarify presidential succession and address situations in which a sitting president is unable to perform the duties of the office. It was introduced in the wake of President John F Kennedy's assassination, after lawmakers acknowledged serious gaps in the Constitution regarding incapacity and transfer of power.

The amendment does not deal with criminal wrongdoing or political disagreements. Instead, it focuses strictly on continuity of government in cases of death, resignation, or incapacity.

The Four Sections Explained

The amendment is divided into four sections, each addressing a specific scenario.

  • Section 1 states that if the president dies, resigns or is removed from office, the vice president becomes president.
  • Section 2 covers a vice-presidential vacancy, allowing the president to nominate a replacement who must be confirmed by both chambers of Congress.
  • Section 3 allows a president to voluntarily transfer power to the vice president by declaring themselves temporarily unable to discharge their duties, most often used during medical procedures.
  • Section 4, the most controversial and least used, allows the vice president and a majority of the Cabinet to declare that the president is unable to perform the duties of the office, triggering an involuntary transfer of power.

Why Section 4 Is Back in the Spotlight

The current debate centres on Section 4, which has never been used to permanently remove a president. It has resurfaced following Trump's intense burst of online posting, which critics say has raised concerns about judgement and stability, while supporters argue it reflects political messaging rather than incapacity.

Legal scholars consistently stress that Section 4 sets a deliberately high bar and was intended for extreme circumstances such as severe illness or incapacity, not policy disputes or controversial behaviour.

How Section 4 Would Actually Be Invoked

Invoking Section 4 requires the vice president and a majority of Cabinet members to submit a written declaration stating that the president is unable to carry out the duties of the office. The vice president would immediately assume the role of acting president.

If the president disputes the declaration, they can send a written response asserting they are capable. Congress would then have 21 days to decide the issue. To keep the vice president in power, both the House and Senate would need to approve the declaration by a two-thirds majority.

Without those votes, the president would resume their duties.

Social Media's Role in the '33 Posts in 45 Minutes' Moment

Trump's rapid-fire posting has become a focal point in the discussion, highlighting how social media behaviour now plays a role in political scrutiny. While online activity alone does not meet the constitutional threshold for incapacity, it has amplified public debate and driven search interest around the 25th Amendment.

The episode reflects how modern communication platforms can accelerate constitutional conversations, even when no formal process is underway.

Historical Use and Precedent

Since its ratification, the 25th Amendment has been used several times, but almost exclusively under Sections 2 and 3. Presidents have temporarily transferred power during surgeries, and vice-presidential vacancies have been filled through the amendment's procedures.

Section 4 remains untested in practice, reinforcing how extraordinary its use would be.

Where Things Stand Now

Despite the surge in discussion, no official steps have been taken to invoke the 25th Amendment. Constitutional experts emphasise that speculation and public debate do not equate to legal action, and any move would require agreement at the highest levels of government. For now, the amendment remains a constitutional backstop, rarely used and tightly constrained.

Writer's pick