'Discuss the Reality of the Situation': UFO Specialists Scrutinise Donald Trump's UAP Disclosure Plan

Former US Air Force geospatial intelligence specialist Dylan Borland questioned Donald Trump's stance on UAP disclosure during Hang Out with Sean Hannity.

Borland asked, 'When will he begin to discuss the reality of the situation?' Ben Hansen, host of the Discovery+ programme UFO Witness, also spoke about whether an official plan existed.

Borland, described as a former '1N1' specialist, wanted to know why Trump might not disclose information about UFOs.

The supplied account includes no response from Trump and does not establish that he has adopted a UAP disclosure plan.

UFO Specialists Consider What Full Disclosure Would Entail

Borland said full disclosure would require discussion of capabilities and technologies used in current weapons systems.

He also referred to other nations' systems and capabilities. His point raised a question about how much could be shared while keeping those capabilities undisclosed.

Borland said, 'I don't believe so, because full disclosure would have to include talking about current capabilities and technologies in our current weapon systems, as well as other nations'.

The account does not identify the question to which 'I don't believe so' was an answer. His words cannot therefore be treated as a response to a specific Trump proposal.

Borland's distinction matters. Asking Trump to discuss the subject is different from saying that Trump has decided to disclose classified information.

The account offers no announcement, timetable or proposed list of material for release. It gives Borland's assessment of what full disclosure would involve.

Trump's UAP Disclosure Plan Remains Unclear

Hansen said no official plan was in place, although he referred to certain trusted agencies. He did not identify those agencies in the account he provided. It is also unclear whose plan he was describing, so his statement cannot settle whether Trump has his own plan.

Hansen then addressed the treatment of people who join the military or other agencies hoping to serve and to speak out when needed.

He said it was disappointing when they faced mistreatment from within. Hansen described his own experience as different, but said he had faced what the government does to people who join.

Hansen did not give details of that experience in the supplied account, which also identifies no individual case involving someone else.

He connected the issue to what he described as a larger problem in government and said removing that problem would be a heavy burden. He thanked a person bearing that weight and said he did not know how anyone could sleep at night with such responsibility.

Hannity Raises the Risks of UAP Disclosure

Hannity raised what he believed could happen to people trying to inform others. If Trump understood the issue as Borland described it, Hannity said, Trump would know those people were risking their lives. He also said someone who revealed classified information could face threats of prosecution.

The supplied account does not identify a person facing such a threat or describe any pending prosecution. Hannity's remarks warned of possible consequences, not that a particular person was in danger. He said the threat of prosecution could put a person's entire life on hold.