Trump press secretary Katie Zacharia Campaign for Accountability California Law
The Campaign for Accountability has asked the California State Bar to investigate Katie Zacharia for allegedly claiming to be a lawyer without a licence to practise law in the state. Screenshot: The White House/YouTube

Donald Trump's new White House press secretary, Katie Zacharia, is facing questions about her professional credentials after a watchdog asked the State Bar of California to investigate whether she repeatedly presented herself as a lawyer without being licensed to practise law in the United States.

The Campaign for Accountability, a non-profit watchdog organisation, filed the complaint on 14 October 2026, alleging that Zacharia may have violated California law by holding herself out as entitled to practise law without the necessary authorisation. The complaint is a request for an investigation, not a finding of wrongdoing.

Why the California Bar Complaint Targets Katie Zacharia's Legal Credentials

According to the Campaign for Accountability, Zacharia has repeatedly described herself as a lawyer during television appearances and other public engagements. The organisation cited reporting indicating that no record of her admission to practise law had been found in California or any other US jurisdiction.

The complaint also asks the State Bar to examine whether her work as general counsel for the California-based organisation Fix California amounted to the unauthorised practice of law. It requests that any established violations be referred to the appropriate prosecutors.

The State Bar confirmed that it had no record of Zacharia being licensed to practise law in California.

'The State Bar of California has no record of Kate Sharon Zacharia or Kate Sharon Black (or Katie in both instances) having been licensed to practice law in California,' a spokesperson said in a statement. Zacharia's maiden name is Black.

That statement concerns her licensing status in California; it does not, by itself, establish whether she is authorised to practise elsewhere.

Under its confidentiality rules, the State Bar can confirm whether someone passed the bar examination but cannot disclose whether they took it.

At Least 18 Television Appearances Cited in the Allegations

According to the complaint, Zacharia was identified on screen as a lawyer in at least 18 Fox News appearances since March 2025.

The watchdog also cited her public statements about her legal experience, including a reported appearance on The Greg Kelly Show on 5 October 2026, during which she said, 'I'm a lawyer'.

The organisation argues that the frequency and reach of these statements warrant regulatory scrutiny.

California Business and Professions Code Section 6126(a) makes it a misdemeanour for someone who is not an active State Bar licensee, or otherwise legally authorised to practise in the state, to hold themselves out as practising or entitled to practise law.

The provision carries a potential penalty of up to one year in county jail, a fine of up to $1,000, or both. Whether it applies to Zacharia's statements or work would depend on the evidence and the relevant legal process.

Trump Questioned About Zacharia's Bar Qualifications

Reporters questioned Trump about Zacharia's legal qualifications on 13 October as they prepared to leave the White House for Alaska. Asked which state she had passed the bar examination in, Trump turned to her and repeated the question.

Zacharia responded, 'When I moved to China'. Her answer did not identify a US state or clarify whether she had been admitted to practise law in any jurisdiction.

The exchange left the question of her licensing status unanswered.

White House Defends Zacharia

White House communications director Steven Cheung defended Zacharia, praising her appointment and attacking the organisation behind the complaint.

In a post on X, he used derogatory language to describe the Campaign for Accountability and dismissed its credibility.

The watchdog has asked the State Bar to examine Zacharia's statements and legal work and determine whether further action is warranted. The filing does not establish that an investigation has opened or that she has committed an offence.