PwC
PwC's recent decision to cut 1,500 jobs in its US operations has drawn fire, particularly as it coincides with the unveiling of a new, simplified logo as part of a global brand update. Pexels

In a move that has left employees fuming and industry watchers raising eyebrows, accounting giant PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) has unveiled a costly brand refresh mere days after slashing 1,500 jobs from its American workforce.

The 'Big Four' firm revealed its redesigned logo on 6 May – swapping its familiar multi-coloured butterfly for two orange parallelograms – whilst simultaneously wielding the redundancy axe across its US operations.

Staff learned of their fate through Microsoft Teams meetings held earlier this week, with cuts representing 2% of PwC's 75,000 US employees. The redundancies primarily hit the firm's audit and tax departments, including some who had only recently joined the company.

Critics Slam 'Pointless' Rebrand As Jobs Are Axed

The redesigned logo maintains the same lettering as before, but it swaps the previously used multicoloured butterfly symbol for a more basic design featuring two orange parallelograms. Nevertheless, the brand refresh has drawn sharp criticism, with many labelling it 'utterly pointless' and a 'waste of money.'

PwC employees have taken to the social media platform Reddit to express their bewilderment. They question the timing of the accounting firm's brand refresh, especially when company profits are reportedly under pressure.

New PwC rebrand just dropped— who wants to guess how much they paid for two orange boxes?
by u/maora34 in consulting

'They likely had two he analyst work for 2 weeks putting in 18 hours a day to Produce 6 slides to describe the new logo,' one Reddit user said. Another user reacted to the new logo, stating, 'God damn this is dumb.'

Cost-Cutting Measures

This development coincides with a cost-cutting initiative at PwC. In recent months, the firm has reportedly dismissed numerous employees amidst a downturn in the consulting sector.

Last September, PwC initiated its first formal round of job reductions in its US operations since 2009. According to The Wall Street Journal, this restructuring involved the departure of 1,800 individuals, representing 2.5% of its American workforce.

Separately, the accounting firm reportedly initiated a 'silent layoffs' round in the UK last June. The Financial Times reported that affected staff were instructed not to disclose the reasons for their departure to their colleagues.

A company official told The Financial Times that PwC found it necessary to 'keep the shape of our business under review to respond to changing client demand, attrition rates and new opportunities.'

Facing this downturn, PwC also severed connections with 123 partners and suspended its technology apprenticeship program. These actions occurred as the remaining partners strived to maintain their compensation levels following consecutive annual payout reductions over the past two years.

A Costly Redesign Amidst Economic Headwinds

Paul Burke, who heads an advertising firm and has contributed to branding efforts for Innocent Drinks and Leon, commented on the brand refresh: 'What's the point? It's just so lazy. Somebody's charged them money for not doing very much.'

PwC has not revealed the expenses associated with this recent rebrand. However, one marketing specialist suggested that the advertising agency fees alone could reach hundreds of thousands of pounds. This expenditure on a cosmetic makeover comes at a stark time for many within the company.

As The Financial Times reported on Monday, PwC is reducing its US workforce by 1,500 positions. These job cuts represent 2% of PwC's 75,000 employees in the United States and primarily affect its audit and tax departments.

Job Cuts Hit US Workforce After Years Of Low Turnover

PwC informed The Financial Times that this decision to reduce staff stemmed from several years of low voluntary attrition. In other words, fewer employees were leaving the company independently.

Before opting for layoffs, PwC said it conducted a months-long review of its operations and reassigned hundreds of individuals from roles with less demand to areas with greater growth potential. Those affected by the job reductions were notified earlier this week, on Monday and Tuesday, through meetings held on Microsoft Teams.

'This was a difficult decision, and we made it with care, thoughtfulness and a deep awareness of its impact on our people, appreciating that historically low levels of attrition over consecutive years have made it necessary to take this step,' PwC told The Financial Times.

Among the individuals who lost their jobs were some who had recently started their careers at the firm. One employee, who joined in September, shared with The Financial Times their feelings of being 'devastated' and noted that 'everyone was completely blindsided by the layoffs.'

Other major firms have also been reducing their workforce. Last month, Deloitte announced it would be letting go of an undisclosed number of US employees within its consulting operations. This firm has a substantial US workforce of 173,000 individuals.

Similarly, EY cut approximately 100 positions from its US consulting division in February, representing a 1% decrease in its 7,000-person US workforce. In November, KPMG also announced a reduction in its US staff, letting go of 330 individuals, constituting roughly 4% of its 9,000-person US workforce. It cited low employee turnover as a contributing factor.

As pressure mounts on professional services firms to justify every pound spent, the question remains: was PwC's decision to invest in a barely-changed logo whilst showing staff the door a tone-deaf misstep or simply business as usual in today's corporate landscape?

Writer's pick