Anthropic CEO Warns AI Could Wipe Out Half of Entry-Level White-Collar Roles — Is Your Job in Trouble?

Dario Amodei, the CEO of Anthropic, has issued a sobering and unsettling warning: AI could eliminate up to 50 percent of entry-level white-collar jobs over the next few years. Rather than talking about factory automation or minimum-wage roles, he is pointing to jobs in fields like law, consulting, finance, and technology, the very sectors that many young professionals rely on to launch their careers. His concern is that the adoption of AI will move so quickly, and so massively, that unemployment could spike dramatically if nothing is done. For anyone starting out in an office-based career, that raises a chilling question: is your job truly safe?

Why Anthropic's Warning Matters

Amodei's warning hits harder because it comes not from a distant academic, but from the head of one of the world's most influential AI companies. He believes that today's AI models, like those developed by Anthropic, are already powerful enough to take over many of the repetitive yet variable tasks that define entry-level white-collar work.

He argues that most people do not realise how serious this threat is. According to Amodei, many workers and even policymakers are completely unaware of the scale and speed of disruption that AI could bring. In interviews, he has stressed that as the producers of this technology, Anthropic and other AI developers have a duty to be honest about what might come. Moreover, rather than sugarcoat the risks, he says, it is time to steer the technology in a different direction. He cautions that businesses may see this as a cost-saving opportunity and rapidly embrace AI to replace junior staff rather than augment them.

Amodei does not suggest that society can simply stop AI. Instead, he argues, the only viable response is to influence its trajectory now. He envisions a future where AI is used intelligently, not to maximise profits by cutting labour, but to enhance productivity while preserving meaningful work. And this requires public awareness, regulatory foresight, and thoughtful planning among AI companies.

READ MORE: IBM Massive Layoff: Company To Axe Thousands of Jobs Amid Cloud And AI Rush

Which Jobs Are Most at Risk and What Can Be Done

The roles Amodei points out are not speculative. He repeatedly points to entry-level positions in law firms, where first-year associates spend hours on document review, and in consulting or finance, where junior analysts track spreadsheets and generate routine reports. These tasks are exactly the ones that AI systems are increasingly capable of automating. Because they are predictable yet varied, AI can learn to handle them efficiently and sometimes even more consistently than a human.

Amodei emphasises that this is not a distant risk. He expects that within the next one to five years, many companies will begin to deploy AI aggressively in order to reduce costs, potentially avoiding hiring junior employees altogether. The consequence, he warns, could be a spike in unemployment rates to between 10 and 20 percent as entry-level opportunities collapse.

To address this, experts argue for a proactive and multi-faceted approach. First, they suggest greater transparency from AI firms, arguing that companies must acknowledge the risks publicly, not just in private boardrooms. They also call on governments to step in and to regulate the deployment of AI, to support education and retraining, and to help create a social safety net for workers displaced by automation.

They also suggest that workers themselves should prepare by learning how to collaborate with AI, which means developing skills that complement machine intelligence rather than compete with it. By elevating their role from pure executor to strategic overseer, employees may be better positioned to excel in a more automated workplace.

Amodei and other experts argue that these changes are not only possible but imperative. If decision-makers act now to guide the development and adoption of AI, the technology could be a force for tremendous good. However, if the risks are ignored, a powerful tool for progress could turn into a driver of economic dislocation and inequality.

What Critics Are Saying

Not all tech leaders share Amodei's gloomy outlook. As per sources, some leaders in the tech industry believe his predictions are overly pessimistic. Some, like Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, have pushed back, arguing that AI will create new roles even as it automates some existing ones. Moreover, according to Huang, the fear of mass job destruction overlooks the potential for innovation and job creation that AI could unlock, especially in emerging sectors. Others agree with this view, pointing out that AI historically has led to more new forms of work even as it disrupts older ones. Entrepreneur Mark Cuban has also reportedly argued that AI will generate a wave of new companies and with them, new jobs.

Meanwhile, Arthur Mensch, Mistral AI's CEO, warns not just about jobs being lost, but about 'deskilling'. If AI handles many of the cognitive tasks now done by human workers, people may lose critical thinking skills or fail to develop experience in foundational roles. Without entry-level jobs, the next generation might miss out on basic training grounds, which could hamper their ability to grow into more senior, creative, or strategic roles.