The 'Menu of Children': How Epstein Allegedly Used 'Minor, Baby, Teen' Labels to Classify Victims by Preference

After financier Jeffrey Epstein was arrested and then died, the world had to deal with the huge size of his alleged trafficking operation. There have been a lot of stories about a 'black book' and flight logs, but a more disturbing part of the conspiracy has come to light: the idea of a 'menu'.

Recent viral leaks of court documents and communications show that victims were allegedly not only targeted but also sorted by age and appearance into groups with labels like 'Minor', 'Baby', and 'Teen'. These groups were then shown to powerful associates as a group of people who could be abused.

The Code Words of the Elite

Internet sleuths have analysed the language used in emails connected to Epstein and his vast network of wealthy associates. The theory suggests that specific terminology obscured criminal activities, enabling predators to communicate their preferences without arousing suspicion.

Analysis of these documents reveals a chilling discovery: that the names of famous, powerful figures are often directly associated with specific age-based preferences. The labels, ranging from the vague 'Minor' to the disturbingly specific 'Baby', paint a picture of a menu designed to dehumanise victims into mere categories of preference.

The Resurgence of Pizzagate and Culinary Code Words

This systematic labelling has inevitably led investigators and online communities back to the 2016 Pizzagate conspiracy theory. That theory, once dismissed as baseless, suggested that elite figures used code words related to food, like 'pizza' or 'cheese', to discuss child trafficking. The language found in Epstein's later emails has caused many to re-evaluate these ideas.

The correspondence between powerful men allegedly includes references to 'jerky' and discussions about consuming human flesh, blurring the line between metaphor and code. The imagery evoked, of elite individuals 'dining' on human beings as if ordering a delicacy, has become a central theme for those who believe the 'menu' was more than a metaphor but a literal system for ordering human beings. It suggests a culture so depraved that it treats the abduction and abuse of minors as a transactional experience akin to choosing a meal.

The Public's Grim Realisation

Epstein's possible access to a vast library of innocent school children has sparked outrage and a grim sense of resignation on social media. The concept of a 'menu' transforms the abstract horror of trafficking into a tangible, transactional nightmare.

Public sentiment reflects profound betrayal: the notion that rich and powerful men, some of whom run countries and shape policy, were allegedly able to 'order' children from a menu. This feeling is compounded by the mundane reality of citizens working and paying taxes to support a system that may have protected these predators rather than the children. It frames the Epstein scandal not as the actions of a single deviant, but as a systemic failure where wealth creates a separate, lawless reality.

The Eugenics Connection: Breeding and Selection

Beyond the immediate horror of abuse, the alleged 'menu' system appears underpinned by a darker ideology: eugenics. Associates have testified to Epstein's obsession with controlling reproduction to propagate desirable traits, adding a disturbing layer to the victim categorisation.

Analysis indicates that Epstein perceived women as conduits for disseminating his DNA and that of other affluent men. The 'menu' thus served not only his friends' gratification but also as a selection catalogue based on race, appearance, and genetic fitness. This evidence transforms the operation from simple criminality into an alleged breeding programme, where children were sorted for both abuse and reproductive exploitation.