Bonnie Blue
Bonnie Blue, whose real name is Tia Billinger, has said her infant is ‘loved, protected and incredibly well looked after’ amid renewed public scrutiny of content involving the child instagram: bonnieblue

A child protection lawyer has called for a safeguarding assessment after adult-content creator Bonnie Blue said she planned to auction her newborn's name, arguing that a baby cannot consent to being part of a 'rage-bait strategy'. Nieki Shaw said the child's identity was being drawn into Blue's 'stunts, brands and rage-baits'.

Blue, whose real name is Tia Billinger, said in an Instagram video that she would auction her baby's name the following week. She said the proposal would keep the child in a 'higher tax bracket' than people she accused of 'living off benefits and claiming unseen disabilities'.

Shaw's comments introduce a safeguarding concern into the coverage of the proposed auction and the use of the child's identity in public content. There is no publicly reported finding by a court, police force, local authority or child-protection body that the child has suffered harm.

Bonnie Blue's Baby-Name Auction

Blue said followers would be able to name the child 'for a price', though it is unclear how the auction would work, what it would cost, or whether it went ahead. A representative for Blue was approached for comment but had not responded at the time of publication.

@legallynik2

This week I was thinking a lot about what advice I would be giving to my client department if I was still working within a local authority as a child protection lawyer, in particular had it been Bonnie Blue’s. Whilst I can’t comment on the child’s day to day physical care (I can only assume that’s ok), I cannot get away from the baby’s identity being dragged into her stunts, brands and rage baits. It’s so deeply disturbing and I believe constitutes safeguarding. Safeguarding however does not automatically equate to removing a baby from a parent. An LA will do everything they can to keep baby and parents together. One way in which they will work with parents is placing the baby on a child in need plan or child protection plan, depending on the welfare concerns. If baby is not on some kind of plan then I am genuinely confused & think there’s a failure somewhere (which wouldn’t be shocking tbh).

♬ original sound - LegallyNik2

Child protection lawyer Nieki Shaw addressed the announcement in the TikTok video above, saying she could not comment on the baby's day-to-day physical care but was troubled by the child's identity being used in what she called 'rage-bait'.

She said the situation was 'deeply disturbing' and that she'd expect the local authority to consider a safeguarding assessment, citing Section 31 of the Children Act 1989, which defines harm as including ill-treatment and impairment of a child's health or development, not limited to physical conduct.

What Shaw Said About 'Emotional Abuse'

Shaw said safeguarding law 'recognises emotional abuse to include corruption or the exploitation of a child', a description of the legal framework she was applying, not a claim that any authority had found Blue's conduct amounted to abuse.

She said she was concerned about the adult content, the public outrage around it, and the possible effect on the child's emotional development, concluding that 'a baby cannot consent to being a part of anybody's rage-bait strategy.'

Her comments amount to a call for risk to be assessed, not confirmation that one has been opened or that any finding has been made.

Read more

Earlier NSPCC Concern

The new comments follow an earlier referral to the NSPCC by Conservative Party equalities spokeswoman Joy Morrissey over a separate promotional clip. It showed Blue on a bed holding what appeared to be a baby while three masked men stood nearby.

Blue said in the footage: 'Yes, I just had a baby, but that means the six-week rule does not apply to me because I had a C-section. Down there still looking perfect.' The reporting states that it remains unclear whether the baby shown in the clip was real or a doll.

Morrissey said the material raised 'serious safeguarding concerns' in a letter to the charity. The NSPCC has publicly acknowledged receiving a concern and said it takes concerns relating to children's safety and wellbeing seriously, but has not publicly announced a finding or a specific intervention in the case.

Blue later described her infant as 'loved, protected and incredibly well looked after'. She said: 'Becoming a mum hasn't changed the fact that I'm Bonnie Blue, but I know exactly where Bonnie ends and being a mum begins.'

What Is Known So Far

The reports establish that Blue announced a proposed baby-name auction and that Shaw called for a safeguarding assessment while citing 'emotional abuse' as part of the safeguarding framework she discussed. They do not report a completed auction, the start of an assessment, or an official finding that Blue's child has suffered harm.

This report attributes all concerns to the people who raised them and distinguishes those opinions from the outcome of any official process. The central reported development remains Shaw's call for an assessment, rather than a finding of abuse.

Writer's pick