Donald Trump Chelsea football
Donald Trump in the middle as the Chelsea FC team celebrates their win at the MetLife Stadium. @WhiteHouse/X

Trouble is brewing for Chelsea FC after the popular club was slapped with scandalous allegations by the Football Association [FA], which has charged it with 74 breaches of rules concerning agents, intermediaries and third-party investment that could lead to multi-million dollar fines and even sanctions against it. The club must respond by 19 September 2025.

The Accusations and Their Origins

According to statements from the FA that surfaced on 11 September 2025, Chelsea was accused of breaching regulations governing the relationship between clubs, agents, and third-party investors in players.

This alleged misconduct spans from 2009 through 2022, with most of the transgressions reportedly occurring during the 2010-2011 to 2015-2016 seasons when Roman Abramovich was the owner. However, ownership has now changed.

The multiple allegations cited by the FA were based on violations of regulations that include J1 and C2 of the FA's Football Agents Regulations, A2 and A3 of the FA Regulations on Working With Intermediaries, and A1 and B3 of the FA Third Party Investment in Players Regulations. Central to the allegations are payments to agents and intermediaries, sometimes undeclared or using unregistered intermediaries, and third-party investment arrangements in player transfers.

Chelsea's Response To The Allegations

Chelsea's current ownership, led by Todd Boehly, completed its takeover in May 2022. It was before the purchase, during the due diligence process, that they discovered irregularities in the club's historical financial reporting. Upon discovering these issues, they self-reported them to the FA, as well as to other relevant regulators.

The club has emphasised that it has shown "unprecedented transparency", granting full access to its historical data and club files. Chelsea also stressed that many of the alleged offences are from over a decade ago under prior ownership, which is a fair argument from their side. They are cooperating fully with the FA and have stated that they wish for the matter to be concluded as quickly as possible.

What Penalties Chelsea Might Face

The FA has given Chelsea until 19 September 2025 to respond formally to the 74 charges. Once Chelsea responds fully, an independent regulatory commission is expected to be established to assess the case and decide on the consequences.

Media outlets and analysts believe the most likely punishment will be a financial fine rather than a sporting sanction such as a points deduction or transfer ban. Some reports suggest that Chelsea are not expected to face a points deduction or other sporting penalties if the allegations are upheld, given the full cooperation and self-reporting. The fine, though, is gonna be a big one. It would perhaps be in the same ballpark as the club's recent €10 million settlement with UEFA. So this time too about £8-10 million fine is being speculated.

Why The Punishment Might Be Limited

Many factors hint that Chelsea could avoid the harshest possible punishment. Firstly, they reported it themselves, and that has to carry some favour in the FA disciplinary processes.

Secondly, many alleged breaches date from a period under previous ownership, when internal controls may have been different. Chelsea can point out that much of the conduct happened over a decade ago, which complicates assessing competitive advantage or direct impact on outcomes, simply put, can weaken the allegations against them.

Chelsea
Chelsea took care of business as they beat Fulham 2-0 away from home. Tony Obrien/Reuters

Finally, some of the financial or tax issues implicated have already been addressed or settled. For example, Chelsea agreed in 2023 to pay UEFA a €10 million fine for "incomplete financial reporting" during the previous ownership. So they do hold a good rep.

Risks If FA Opts For Stricter Sanctions

While, as of now, a fine seems probable, there remains a big risk if the FA takes a stricter view. If the independent commission concludes that any of the breaches gave Chelsea a sporting advantage or unfair gain, transfer bans or points deductions could be considered. That will not go well with Chelsea fans. Such sanctions would carry heavy consequences not only in terms of competition but also in terms of the reputation and financial health of the club.

Is There Any Way Out?

Suppose things remain the same and do not get worse. In that case, Chelsea's most likely path is to accept a financial penalty, possibly similar in magnitude to the UEFA fine, while avoiding sporting sanctions. Their cooperation, self-disclosure, and the fact that many offences date from a previous era under different ownership provide them with avenues for mitigating all allegations.

Hence, if Chelsea can convincingly show that none of the alleged misconduct changed match outcomes, league standings or gave them an unfair competitive advantage, they stand a better chance of escaping more damaging punishment than a hefty money penalty.