Erika Kirk
Erika Kirk speaks publicly about her husband Charlie Kirk’s fatal shooting YouTube

In a political week dominated by serious policy debates, the most viral conversation focused squarely on a joke about a hug and a potential breach of decorum involving the Vice President. Erika Kirk, the widow of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, has reignited controversy over her viral on-stage embrace with Vice President JD Vance by offering a shockingly candid defence.

Kirk, who was accused of being 'inappropriate' during the initial embrace last month, appeared on Megyn Kelly Live over the weekend and joked that she would have faced 'less hate' if she had 'touched the back of his a--.'

The resulting public furore has transformed what began as a moment of comfort for a grieving widow into a contentious debate about public boundaries and the 'love language' of touch in the political arena.

READ MORE: Brian Harpole On Erika Kirk: 'You Don't Want To Hear' Her Reaction To Body

READ MORE: Erika Kirk's Alleged 'Love Triangle' with Donald Trump and JD Vance: All You Need to Know

Erika Kirk's Defence: 'My Love Language Is Touch' Amid Hug Backlash

The controversial embrace took place at the University of Mississippi on October 29. This was the 37-year-old mother of two's first Turning Point USA campus appearance since the tragic assassination of her husband, which added immense emotional weight to the occasion. After speaking movingly about losing her 'best friend' when Charlie was killed, Erika Kirk introduced Vice President Vance to the stage.

The moment of greeting was immediately scrutinised: the pair tightly embraced, and Erika Kirk was photographed grasping the back of the Vice President's head before departing the stage. Critics swiftly described the greeting as 'disgusting' and 'inappropriate' for a public, on-stage interaction between a married Vice President and a grieving widow.

Speaking about the criticism to Megyn Kelly, Erika Kirk was defiant. She told the former Fox News anchor: 'My love language is touch if you will.' She even offered a detailed 'play-by-play' of the brief encounter as an image of the moment appeared behind her.

Erika Kirk recalled the exchange: 'I'm walking over, he's walking over, I'm starting to cry, he says 'he's so proud of you,' and I say 'God bless you,' and I touch the back of his head.' She dismissed the criticism, arguing: 'Anyone who I've hugged, I've touched the back of your head when I hug you, I always say God bless you. That's just me. If you want to take that out of context, go right ahead.'

She concluded by stating that critics who were 'hating on a hug' clearly 'need a hug themselves.'

The Comment That Caused Chaos: Why Erika Kirk's Joke Backfired

Despite her earnest attempt to explain the hug as simply her 'love language', the interview took a sharp turn into deeper controversy. Kelly noted the severity of the online backlash, saying: 'They were acting like you touched the back of his a--.'

Erika Kirk responded with the comment that has since caused the most renewed fury online: 'I feel like I wouldn't get as much hate if I did that.'

This joke, intended as a light-hearted deflection, did not land well with many observers. Critics argued that the remark actually undermined her earlier attempts at a sincere defence. One X user wrote: 'That's not the classy answer that I was hoping for from her. Now I have to imagine her grabbing JD's butt?'

Another observer commented that the joke 'just proves the point that the whole thing crossed into weird territory.'

Other critics questioned the appropriateness of the entire exchange: 'Who jokes about something like that when it's SOMEONE ELSE's HUSBAND?!?'

A central point of contention remains the professional boundary in such a high-stakes political setting. As one user wrote: 'On stage in a public setting with a married vice President however, is not the time to be speaking one's love language.'

The exchange highlights the continuing tension between public figures attempting to showcase vulnerability and the strict rules of conduct demanded by political office.