Elon Musk
Ashley St. Clair says she rejected a reported $40 million NDA to speak about Elon Musk in Alex Gibney's new documentary, sparking fierce online debate ahead of the film's October release Gage Skidmore/Flickr CC BY-SA 4.0

Ashley St. Clair has said she was offered a financial arrangement worth about US$40 million in exchange for signing a non-disclosure agreement related to her relationship with Elon Musk, a claim that has drawn fresh attention as Alex Gibney's new documentary, Musk, premiered at the Venice Film Festival.

The influencer and mother of one of Musk's children said she turned down the deal and chose to speak publicly instead, prompting online debate about why such a large sum was allegedly proposed.

The nearly four-hour film by Oscar-winning director Alex Gibney draws on interviews with former colleagues, partners and people close to Musk, many of whom were reportedly fearful of speaking publicly.

St. Clair's account forms one of the most discussed strands of the project, which screened out of competition in Venice before a planned US theatrical release in October.

The Alleged NDA Offer and Why It Matters

St. Clair said the proposal came after her relationship with Musk ended and following the birth of their son, Romulus, in 2024.

In her telling, the proposed arrangement would have provided substantial financial support while imposing broad confidentiality and non-disparagement restrictions that, she said, would have barred her from discussing Musk, his employees and his affiliates. She declined to accept the deal.

'I was offered the opportunity not to speak for $40 million,' St. Clair told reporters at a Venice press conference on Tuesday, 8 September. 'So when you're offered something like that, it really causes a debate in your head about what your speech means and how valuable that is, and why do they want to offer me this amount of money to not speak?' She added that she wanted to 'set the example for my kids that we should never take being materially comfortable over speaking the truth.'

St. Clair has described the overall opportunity as worth $40 million, while previously describing a proposed structure of US$15 million upfront plus US$100,000 a month for 20 years, a total of US$39 million in those stated cash payments before any other value attached to the arrangement.

The reported terms have not been independently verified.

Online Reaction and the Documentary's Wider Claims

Clips of St. Clair's remarks circulated quickly after the press conference, with many commentators focusing on the size of the reported offer.

A common question online is straightforward: why would anyone offer such a large sum in exchange for silence? Others praised her decision to refuse the money, though some voiced concern for her and her child's safety given the high-profile nature of the dispute.

Gibney said many potential interviewees were too fearful to speak publicly about Musk, describing an atmosphere of 'almost existential fear' around the production. The documentary portrays Musk as a 'confidence man,' while taking a sharply critical view of his character and influence, according to early coverage.

It includes interviews with figures such as his father Errol Musk, first wife Justine Musk, tech journalists Kara Swisher and Zoë Schiffer, and AI researcher Geoffrey Hinton. Musk declined to be interviewed for the documentary.

The central question is what, if anything, the alleged offer was intended to prevent St. Clair from discussing. St. Clair's account has prompted questions about why such an agreement was allegedly proposed.

The film, Musk, is scheduled for US theatrical release on 16 October 2026, and it remains to be seen whether it sheds more light on the alleged NDA offer and the broader questions raised by St. Clair's account.