MAGA Supporter Tells Victims To 'Get Over It' Before Being Shown Trump's Sexual Abuse Verdict

A MAGA supporter was left backtracking during a fiery podcast debate after repeatedly insisting people should eventually 'get over' painful events, including rape. His argument took a sharp turn when host Dean confronted him with Donald Trump's 2023 civil verdict involving writer E. Jean Carroll, forcing him to acknowledge a court finding he said he had not previously known about.

Trump Supporter Explains Why He Backs Trump

The discussion initially focused on why the guest continues to support Trump.

He cited Trump's approach to global relations and support for the military, pointing to countries including Venezuela and Iran. Dean challenged several of his claims about US foreign policy, including his assertion that America had closed the Strait of Hormuz.

Unable to provide a source for that claim, the conversation shifted towards Trump's domestic record and allegations of sexual misconduct.

The supporter argued that one bad act should not automatically define someone's entire character. Dean pushed back, saying rape was fundamentally different from offences such as theft or infidelity because of the harm inflicted on victims.

Carroll Case Changes the Argument

Trump's legal history became the focus when Dean raised Carroll's allegations.

The supporter initially insisted Trump had never been found guilty of rape. Dean then explained that Carroll's case was civil rather than criminal and showed him the jury verdict.

In May 2023, a federal jury found Trump liable for sexually abusing Carroll and awarded her $2 million (£1.51 million) in damages connected to that claim. Jurors also found Trump liable for defamation and awarded additional damages.

Trump was not criminally convicted of rape in Carroll's case. However, the jury's civil finding of sexual abuse became central to the argument.

After seeing the verdict, the supporter admitted he had not known about it.

'Now you do,' Dean responded.

'Get Over It' Ignites Heated Debate

Tensions escalated when the conversation turned to how society should treat past sexual violence.The supporter argued that people eventually have to move forward from painful experiences.

'It happened. Get over it,' he said.

Dean immediately challenged that position, asking why a rape victim should be told to simply move on from an assault.

The supporter later clarified that he meant people should eventually process what happened rather than remain trapped by it. He pointed to therapy as one way victims could work through trauma. Dean countered that personal healing was different from telling society to stop reflecting on an act of sexual violence.

Supporter Struggles To Define 'Get Over It'

The pair continued debating how long someone should remember or reflect on an assault.

When Dean asked whether the same logic would apply to child rape, the supporter distinguished between adult and child victims. Dean challenged that distinction, arguing that neither victim consented to being raped.

The discussion became increasingly circular, with Dean repeatedly asking what 'get over it' actually meant and when victims or society were supposed to stop reflecting on the assault.

By the end, the supporter maintained that people eventually move beyond past events, while Dean continued pressing him over the consequences of applying that principle to sexual violence.