GoFundMe Goal for Lindsay Clancy's Parents Soars to $3 Million After Mistrial
Fundraising page to help support Lindsay Clancy's parents costs during the trial increased to $3 million following mistrial

The GoFundMe campaign for Lindsay Clancy's parents has raised more than $1.2 million (around £890,000), but following the recent mistrial, the fundraising target has now been increased to $3 million (£2.21 million). Known as the Musgrove Family Fund, the campaign was created to help Clancy's parents, Mike and Paula Musgrove, cope with the financial and emotional toll of their daughter's ongoing legal proceedings.
The dramatic increase in the GoFundMe's target comes after jurors failed to reach a unanimous verdict in Clancy's trial, which centred on the deaths of her three young children in January 2023.
Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial after the jury became deadlocked following days of deliberations. Prosecutors could still seek a retrial, with a hearing scheduled for September 29 to determine the next steps.
A Dramatic Increase

The fundraiser was organised by Brandee Mulligan, who isn't related to the Clancy or Musgrove families.
Mulligan said the decision to raise the goal to $3 million was driven by the possibility that the legal process could continue for considerably longer following the mistrial. She added that it's specifically intended for Mike and Paula rather than funding Lindsay Clancy's legal defence.
Furthermore, the organiser has also stressed that donations are not necessarily an endorsement of Clancy's actions or a statement about whether she should be found guilty or not guilty.
Clancy Trial Ends in Deadlock
Clancy, a former labour and delivery nurse, was accused of killing her children, Cora, five, Dawson, three, and eight-month-old Callan.
The children were attacked at the family's Duxbury home on January 24, 2023. Cora, five, and Dawson, three, died that night, while their eight-month-old brother Callan died three days later in hospital.
Clancy has admitted strangling her three children, but pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity, with her defence arguing that severe postpartum psychosis left her unable to appreciate or control her actions.
In the months before the killings, she attended a postpartum treatment programme at Women & Infants Hospital in Rhode Island in December 2022 but was not accepted for further treatment. Her defence later argued that concerns about her medications contributed to the decision.
Court evidence showed that she received more than 30 prescriptions for 13 different psychiatric medications from multiple providers in the months before the killings. Her defence argued that this fragmented treatment and what it described as polypharmacy contributed to her deteriorating mental state, an account disputed by the prosecution.
Medical providers disputed elements of that account, with some testifying that they did not observe signs of psychosis at the time. Prosecutors, meanwhile, argued that she understood her actions and should be held criminally responsible.
@pop.diaries After seven days of deliberations, the jury in the Lindsay Clancy case was unable to reach a unanimous verdict, and a judge declared a mistrial Friday. The jury had been tasked with determining whether Clancy was criminally responsible, with the defense arguing that she was experiencing postpartum psychosis at the time and the prosecution disputing that claim. The deliberations became contentious this week after the jury foreperson told the judge that a lone juror was refusing to follow the court’s instructions regarding reasonable doubt. Clancy’s defense requested that the juror be removed from the case. The judge initially indicated that he would declare a mistrial, but then paused the process to allow the defense to appeal to Massachusetts’ highest court. The appeal did not prevent the mistrial from ultimately being declared, leaving the case unresolved. Because the jury did not reach a verdict, prosecutors can potentially retry the case, meaning this may not be the final chapter in the legal proceedings. #lindsayclancy #lindsayclancytrial #courtcase #truecrime #truecrimetok
♬ original sound - pop diaries
The jury deliberated for several days but ultimately could not reach the unanimous decision required to resolve the case. The jury reportedly split 11-1, with 11 jurors favouring a finding that Clancy was not criminally responsible by reason of insanity and one juror refusing to agree.
The Musgroves Face An Uncertain Future
The Musgroves have relocated from Connecticut to Massachusetts to remain close to their daughter throughout the proceedings, with the family facing the financial costs associated with the case. Meanwhile, their fundraiser continues to attract donations from supporters who want to assist them through what could become an extended legal process.
For now, the future of Clancy's case rests with prosecutors and the court. A retrial remains possible, while other options could include a plea agreement or further legal challenges from the defence.
© Copyright IBTimes 2026. All rights reserved.


















