Hailey Bieber
Instagram/haileybieber

Hailey Bieber's red-carpet activism at the 68th Grammy Awards has been overshadowed by the resurfacing of an alleged racist tweet from more than a decade ago.

The model and her husband Justin Bieber appeared at Sunday's ceremony in Los Angeles wearing matching 'ICE OUT' pins, joining a wave of artists protesting US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) policies. But within hours, archived screenshots of a 2012 post allegedly from Bieber's former Twitter account began recirculating online, sparking fresh debate about accountability, racial sensitivity and whether past behaviour undermines present activism.

The 2012 tweet read: 'Shut up before I smack you back to your own country,' and it began trending. The clash between Bieber's present-day political signalling and her past social media language has once again placed the spotlight on how celebrity advocacy is judged in the digital age.

Grammy Statement Meets Historic Controversy

Bieber's fashion choice at the Grammys was unmistakably political. The 'ICE OUT' pins have become a visual shorthand for criticism of immigration enforcement and deportation practices, worn by multiple artists this awards season.

According to industry reporting, the pins were part of a broader wave of celebrity gestures against ICE, which have appeared on several red carpets and at events such as the Sundance Film Festival and the Golden Globes.

Stars including Billie Eilish, Kehlani, Bad Bunny and others also used the ceremony to criticise the agency. Eilish reportedly said publicly "F*** ICE" while Bad Bunny drew sustained applause after referencing the phrase during his acceptance speech.

But Bieber's moment was overshadowed by the sudden resurgence of archived social posts from her Twitter account in the early 2010s, first widely documented in entertainment archives and reposted on social networks.

The most widely circulated of these is a tweet allegedly posted on 22 January 2012 reading: 'Shut up before I smack you back to your own country,' attributed to her then-active young adult account.

At the time, coverage from entertainment sites noted this and other messages from 2012–2013 that many interpreted as racially insensitive, including remarks about people who did not celebrate Thanksgiving.

These posts were deleted long ago when Bieber exited Twitter; she left the platform around 2018, citing the hostile nature of social media and its effects on her mental health in a YouTube discussion focusing on the toxicity of platforms like Twitter.

Despite being deleted, the screenshots have circulated repeatedly on X (formerly Twitter) and other social media, especially when Bieber is in the public eye, amplifying the issue anew. No verified archive link to the original tweet has been preserved publicly by Twitter's own archival services.

Public Reaction and the Debate Over Accountability

The resurfacing of the tweet sparked immediate debate online. Critics argue that Bieber's visible role in activism should compel her to address her past comments directly. Many social media users contrasted her current statements of solidarity against injustice with the earlier problematic tweet.

Several commentators emphasised that symbols like 'ICE OUT,' meant to critique immigration enforcement and systemic inequalities clash in public perception with an unacknowledged history of racially charged comments. These arguments reflect broader conversations about how past social media behaviour intersects with present political stances.

ICE Out
Federal judge rejects Minnesota’s bid to halt Trump’s immigration crackdown in Minneapolis, days after fatal Border Patrol shooting of ICU nurse Alex Pretti. Fibonacci Blue/WikiMedia Commons

Others countered that Bieber was a teenager at the time of the original posts and pointed to the absence of any public apology or statement from her addressing that specific content. Some advocates for accountability highlighted that deleted historical posts by public figures nevertheless inform contemporary perceptions of sincerity in activism.

Despite this digital backlash, mainstream news outlets covering the Grammys largely focused on Bieber's activism and other artists' speeches rather than the tweet controversy itself.

Hailey Bieber's Public Position and Silence

Bieber's exit from Twitter nearly a decade ago and subsequent focus on platforms like Instagram and YouTube have meant that her current public communications are often managed through those channels rather than direct engagement with resurfaced historical posts.

Her previous discussions about quitting Twitter described the emotional toll of social media without making a specific reference to racial controversy.

Her husband, Justin Bieber, has at times publicly defended her against general criticisms from online trolls, but those defences have focused on personal attacks rather than the specific racial issues underlying the current debate.

The juxtaposition of Bieber's anti-ICE symbol with the resurfaced racist tweet amplifies ongoing public discourse about how celebrities engage with activism.

These debates are not unique to Bieber; other public figures have faced scrutiny when historical social media posts resurface amid modern controversies.

Sincerity in the Spotlight

The 'Bieber Controversy' has become a microcosm of the larger debate over celebrity activism. While mainstream coverage focused on the couple's sleek all-black ensembles—Justin in oversized Balenciaga and Hailey in sheer Alaïa—the digital discourse remains fixated on whether a public apology for past remarks is required to validate present-day advocacy.

As of 2 February 2026, the Biebers have not issued a formal statement regarding the resurfaced posts, continuing their policy of avoiding direct engagement with historical social media 'digs.'