Erika Kirk Accused of 'Putting on a Show' For Filming Charlie Kirk's Open Casket as She Breaks Down
Public scrutiny intensifies after widow posts intimate footage from late husband's funeral

Erika Kirk's widely shared footage of her grieving at the open casket of her late husband, conservative activist Charlie Kirk, has become a focal point of public controversy, with critics accusing her of staging emotion and exploiting tragedy for attention.
The footage has been viewed millions of times and prompted both sympathy and intense criticism across social media platforms. Supporters say her behaviour exemplifies sincere mourning and public grief.
Controversy Over Public Mourning and Social Media
Erika Kirk's choice to share visuals from beside her husband's open casket has ignited debate over the appropriateness of documenting and publishing such intimate moments.
In the September Instagram post, Erika Kirk was captured sobbing beside Charlie Kirk's casket, kissing his hand and speaking to him directly as mourners looked on. These visuals spread rapidly online, with many users commenting on the rawness of the grief and the stark intimacy of the scene.

Family members and close allies praised her openness as a genuine expression of love and loss. Some defenders emphasised that public figures often have less privacy, especially in moments of personal tragedy. Critics, however, took issue with the decision to film at all.
Can we all now admit how creepy and inauthentic inviting a camera to do a close up of this moment was?pic.twitter.com/bb4NmXMbQ8
— ADAM (@AdameMedia) December 13, 2025
On her podcast and social channels, commentator Candace Owens condemned the dissemination of the casket footage, arguing that the act of recording the moment and sharing it publicly undermined Kirk's subsequent requests for privacy. Owens stated that 'everybody grieves differently,' but insisted the choice to publish such footage was 'a decision' made by Erika Kirk herself and was not inherently private.
Political Backdrop and Internal Conservative Tensions
The backlash over the footage has become entwined with broader disputes within conservative media and political circles following Charlie Kirk's assassination at a Turning Point USA event in September 2025 at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, where a 22-year-old suspect, Tyler Robinson, was arrested and charged with aggravated murder and other offences.
Following Kirk's death, Erika Kirk has taken over as CEO and chair of Turning Point USA, the conservative advocacy group her husband co-founded. Her ascent to leadership, and her public appearances on major news outlets have already sparked debate about her motivations and role within the movement.

In a recent exchange, Owens criticised what she described as 'Meghan Markle syndrome,' alleging that Kirk wanted both public attention and private boundaries in ways that served her personal brand. Owens argued that Kirk 'can't have it both ways,' once she placed cameras at such a private moment, the door to public scrutiny was open.
🚨 BREAKING: Candace Owens just went FULL DEMON on grieving mom Erika Kirk—mocking her plea to keep Charlie’s grave private after she shared his casket online.
— Reverend Jordan Wells (@WellsJorda89710) December 11, 2025
Candace sneers: “You don’t get to pick & choose privacy—Meghan Markle Syndrome.” Then calls Erika a “demonic witch” for… pic.twitter.com/sM3Hym6C53
Grief, Privacy and Public Life
Erika Kirk has publicly acknowledged the challenges of her dual roles as grieving widow and public figure. In televised interviews, she has said she never watched the graphic viral video of her husband's assassination and never intends to, explaining that some images 'mark your soul forever' and that she wants to protect her children from seeing them.
Her critics take issue not with her emotional reaction, but with what they describe as the decision to film or authorise filming those moments at the casket. They argue that such documentation inevitably enters the realm of public consumption and invites commentary, interpretation and — as some term it — 'spectacle'.
Defenders of Kirk counter that public figures often have little control over how their grief is portrayed and that condemning her for expressing raw emotion publicly amounts to policing how individuals mourn.
© Copyright IBTimes 2025. All rights reserved.





















