TikTok 'Psychic' Ordered to Pay $10M Over False Murder Claims Against Professor

In a case that sounds almost too wild to be true, a TikTok psychic has been hit with a $10 million (£7.48 million) judgment after falsely accusing a University of Idaho professor of a grisly murder. It's a shocking reminder that social media fame comes with real-world responsibilities, and online accusations can have life-changing consequences.

From Tarot Cards to a Defamation Lawsuit

Ashley Guillard, who gained popularity as a TikTok psychic, became known for posting videos claiming to reveal hidden truths through Tarot readings and spiritual insight.

But her online presence took a dangerous turn when she accused history professor Rebecca Scofield of being involved in the stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students in 2022.

Guillard's claims were dramatic and specific, suggesting Scofield had orchestrated the killings to hide a romantic relationship with one of the victims.

Even after authorities publicly stated that Scofield was not a suspect, Guillard continued posting videos, tagging Scofield, and sharing personal information, which sparked harassment and serious safety concerns.

The Court Steps In

The case quickly made its way to court, where a federal jury in Boise didn't waste time. After a four-day trial, the jury deliberated for less than two hours before finding Guillard liable for defamation.

Scofield spoke openly about the impact of Guillard's videos, describing months of anxiety, PTSD, and even physical nerve pain, all of which affected her ability to work as chair of the history department.

Judge Raymond Patricco emphasized that Guillard's accusations were based purely on "spiritual intuition" and had no factual basis, underscoring that social media influence doesn't excuse harming someone's life.

What the Verdict Means

The $10 million (£7.48 million) ruling is more than just a payday for Scofield—it's a clear message about accountability in the age of social media. The TikTok psychic defamation case illustrates how quickly false claims can spiral out of control, especially when they're amplified to millions of followers.

For influencers, it's a cautionary tale: your online content isn't harmless, and viral fame won't protect you from the consequences of spreading false information. For viewers, it's a reminder to pause before believing everything you see online, even if it's dramatic or seems 'insider.'

Lessons for Social Media and Beyond

This case also highlights a bigger picture: the digital world is catching up to real-world law. Influencers who make public accusations, even under the guise of psychic readings, can face serious legal and financial repercussions.

Platforms like TikTok might be built for entertainment, but the people behind the accounts are fully responsible for the impact of their posts.

Meanwhile, Scofield's victory shows that truth and patience can prevail, even against viral misinformation. Her story is a wake-up call for anyone navigating the blurred lines between online curiosity, viral fame, and personal safety.

Looking Ahead

Legal experts say the ruling could set an important precedent for social media accountability. It's a signal that the courts are willing to protect individuals from online defamation, and that psychic claims, speculative accusations, or conspiracy-driven content aren't shields from responsibility.

As TikTok psychics and other influencers continue to rise in popularity, this case serves as both a warning and a lesson: fame is powerful, but truth is powerful too, and the law won't hesitate to weigh in when the line is crossed.