UFO
The Pentagon has created a legally protected channel for military-connected insiders to disclose UAP information to a designated government team National Archives Catalog Official Website

The US Department of War has issued a targeted legal waiver allowing certain current and former personnel to disclose UAP-related National Defense Information to authorised representatives of the Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters, or PURSUE.

Announced on 14 September, the measure creates what the department calls an 'authorized, legally protected disclosure mechanism' for eligible service members, civilian personnel and contractors.

For context, the waiver comes as the US government continues its efforts to gather and review information relating to unidentified anomalous phenomena, commonly known as UFOs. PURSUE has already been involved in releasing government UAP records during 2026, with official records showing releases from several government agencies.

The latest move is aimed at people who may have information about UAP-related programmes but have previously been concerned about the consequences of disclosing it.

Waiver Targets UAP Information Held by Personnel

The Department of War said people with direct knowledge of UAP-related programmes have historically raised concerns about potential legal liability, loss of security clearances and administrative prosecution because of non-disclosure agreements and special access programme requirements.

The new waiver is intended to provide a specific route around certain of those concerns.

Under the arrangement, covered current and former Department of War service members, civilian personnel and contractors who hold or previously held access to UAP-related National Defense Information can communicate that information directly to authorised PURSUE representatives.

The department said the waiver 'supersedes civil and administrative enforcement provisions' contained in relevant non-disclosure agreements and Special Access Programme Indoctrination Agreements for communications directed to PURSUE.

That qualification is important.

The announcement does not establish blanket immunity from criminal prosecution, nor does it give personnel unrestricted permission to disclose classified information. It also does not provide a general authorisation to take protected material to journalists or publish it online.

Instead, the legal protection is tied to the authorised disclosure channel.

The department described the process as a way to support systematic review, security evaluation and potential declassification of historical and ongoing UAP information. In practical terms, information submitted through the programme can be assessed by the relevant authorities before any decision is made about whether material can be released.

Route Does Not Mean UFO Claims Will Become Public

For those expecting a sudden release of hidden UFO files, the limits of the waiver may be just as significant as the announcement itself.

A person who believes they possess sensitive UAP information can now use the authorised PURSUE channel under the terms of the waiver. But that does not mean the information will automatically be declassified or made public.

The process leaves room for security review, and the information could remain classified.

That also means the waiver should not be described as making it lawful for alleged whistleblowers to reveal 'UFO secrets' publicly. Its scope is narrower, applying to specified communications with authorised PURSUE representatives and overriding specified civil and administrative enforcement provisions.

The government has also not confirmed the existence of extraterrestrial spacecraft or other extraordinary explanations for UAP sightings through the waiver.

UAP, the terminology used in the government material, refers to unidentified anomalous phenomena. The term itself does not establish that an object or event has an extraterrestrial origin.

The same caution applies to claims about alleged clandestine programmes involving the recovery of crashed craft. People have made such claims in the wider UFO debate, but the material supplied for this report does not establish those programmes as fact.

What the new policy does establish is a formal route for covered individuals to submit information for government review.

That distinction may determine what comes next. PURSUE has been tasked with receiving and processing UAP-related disclosures, while the new waiver removes specified civil and administrative enforcement barriers for qualifying communications.

The arrangement could therefore encourage people who previously hesitated to come forward to submit information through official channels. Whether those disclosures lead to new records, further review or eventual declassification is not yet known.

For now, the Pentagon's move is a change in the process rather than a declaration that previously hidden UFO evidence is about to be released. The information still has to pass through the government's review system before the public can know what, if anything, emerges.