Hugh Jackman
Dick Thomas Johnson/Flickr CC BY 2.0

The most intimate negotiations in celebrity life are rarely the romantic ones. They're the boring, lawyerly conversations about what happens if love stops being enough.

That's why the latest rumour about Hugh Jackman and Sutton Foster has spread so easily: it pretends to offer a peek behind the curtain, into the moment where a famously affable star is asked to protect his fortune—and, allegedly, refuses.

According to Globe Magazine, citing an unnamed 'insider,' Jackman is 'itching to get hitched' to Foster and 'won't even entertain the idea of a prenup', shutting it down 'immediately' because he finds it 'offensive.'

The same report claims friends are worried about Jackman's alleged $120 million net worth, while Foster's is described as $4 million. None of that has been confirmed by Jackman, Foster, or their representatives.​

And yet the story has legs because it plays to an old public fascination: the idea that someone can be worldly enough to build a fortune, but too lovestruck to defend it.

Hugh Jackman And The Prenup Rumour: What's Known Versus What's Guesswork

The verifiable part of this saga is less spicy but more solid. Jackman and Deborra‑Lee Furness have officially finalised their divorce, according to court records reported by People, with the divorce granted in early June 2025. The former couple had announced their separation in September 2023 after 27 years of marriage.

As for Jackman and Foster, the public timeline is fairly clear: they starred together in Broadway's The Music Man, and by January 2025 they were photographed holding hands during an outing in Santa Monica—images that fuelled and, for many, effectively confirmed the relationship. By late 2025, Jackman appeared to acknowledge Foster publicly on Instagram in a way that was widely read as making the relationship 'official'.

Everything beyond that—the speed of wedding plans, private disagreements about money, whether advisers are 'begging' him to be sensible—rests on anonymous sourcing. It may be true. It may be embellishment. It may be the classic thing these stories do, which is to take a plausible human tension (prenups are awkward) and inflate it into a morality play.​

Hugh Jackman, Sutton Foster, And Why The Prenup Story Won't Go Away

A prenup has become, culturally, a proxy argument about trust. Some people see it as cynicism in paper form: a plan for failure. Others see it as the cleanest way to avoid a financial bloodbath later. The public tends to treat it like a litmus test of romance, which is absurd. Most couples don't have $120 million problems to solve.

But Jackman, fairly or unfairly, is also a symbol. He's been sold for years as the decent man in an industry that struggles to produce them: earnest, theatre‑kid polite, the rare star who seems to enjoy being liked. The prenup rumour flips that image into melodrama. If he 'refuses' a legal safeguard out of principle, it's chivalry. If he refuses because he's blinded by love, it's foolishness.​

It also taps into a harsher undercurrent: the suspicion that any woman dating a wealthy man must be 'after something', even when she has her own career and reputation. The Yahoo-syndicated report claims Foster herself would be willing to sign an agreement and 'hates the idea that anyone would think she's in this for the money.'

Again, that's anonymous—and yet it rings true as a social reality. Women in public relationships are routinely forced to prove they aren't opportunists, as if affection must be audited.​

What's striking is how quickly the conversation becomes less about Jackman's choices and more about who deserves what—money as morality, divorce as punishment, romance as a financial instrument. It's a grim little side‑effect of celebrity culture: the assumption that a person's private life is a boardroom.

For now, the only responsible conclusion is the least satisfying one. Jackman's divorce is final. His relationship with Foster is public. Whether he's planning a wedding, and whether he would sign a prenuptial agreement, remains unconfirmed—and arguably none of our business unless they choose to make it so.

Writer's pick