Megan Fox Will 'Send Nanny' to Avoid Machine Gun Kelly as She's 'Not Interested' in Reuniting: Report
Sometimes the clearest sign a love story is over is not anger but administration.

Megan Fox is 'not interested' in getting back together with Machine Gun Kelly, according to an In Touch report published on March 13, days after the singer posted a flirtatious comment on her Instagram photos, reigniting scrutiny of their relationship. The report, centred on the former couple's current co-parenting arrangement, says Fox wants contact with Kelly limited to their daughter rather than any attempt at a romantic reset.
Megan and Kelly, whose real name is Colson Baker, were once engaged and later split, with recent reports describing them as focused on raising their daughter Saga rather than reviving the relationship. The latest claims rely on an unnamed insider and have not been publicly confirmed by either Fox or Kelly, so the story should be treated with a measure of caution.

Megan Fox Sets the Terms With Machine Gun Kelly
The bluntest detail in the report is also the one that gives it shape. According to the insider quoted by In Touch and cited elsewhere, Kelly has not given up on the idea that he and Fox belong together and is said to keep dropping hints about their shared past. Fox, by contrast, is described as having no appetite for reopening that chapter.
That distinction matters because celebrity break ups are often sold as unresolved by default, as if two attractive famous people must always be one nostalgic dinner away from a reunion. In this case, the claim is more clear-cut. The source says Fox is content with the calmer co‑parenting dynamic they have now but sees that peace as dependent on keeping romance out of the relationship.
A public moment appears to have reinforced that impression. After Fox posted photos from a revealing Instagram shoot on March 10, Kelly commented, 'Stoked we had a baby,' a line the report presents less as playful charm than as another nudge in a direction Fox does not want to take. The insider's response to the gesture was icily direct, saying, 'It isn't cute,' and adding that he 'put her through so much pain.' The source says Fox feels she has already absorbed too much damage and is no longer willing to confuse access with intimacy.
The Limits of Co-Parenting
By the account published this week, the pair function better as parents than they do as lovers. The source describes them as 'great as co‑parents' but says matters begin to unravel when a romantic element is reintroduced. It is a familiar pattern, though no less messy for being familiar.
There is a child at the centre of the story, and that appears to be where Fox wants the focus. The insider says she is willing to spend time with Kelly only to create a sense of family for their daughter Saga, who is described in reports as 11 months old. That is a narrower goal than reconciliation and, frankly, a more credible one.
Other recent reporting has pointed in the same direction. In January, TMZ reported that Fox and Kelly were not back together romantically, were living separately and were speaking mainly in connection with their daughter, while an InStyle report described a cordial family outing without claiming any renewed romance. None of that proves the latest insider account, but it does make it look less like a stray tabloid flourish and more like an extension of an already visible arrangement.

Even so, the harshest line in the new report is the one most likely to stick. The insider says Fox 'simply can't trust him' and believes he has betrayed her too many times to justify another attempt, adding that she does not want to model that kind of toxicity for her daughter. It is not elegant language, but then break ups that drag on through co-parenting rarely are.
The report ends with a threat that sounds almost absurd until the realities of celebrity logistics are considered. If Kelly does not respect the boundary, the insider says Fox may stop seeing him in person altogether and 'send a nanny in her place.' The image is chilling, not because it is glamorous, but because it suggests the relationship has been reduced to handovers, schedules, and a final refusal to perform emotional labour for a man she no longer trusts.
© Copyright IBTimes 2025. All rights reserved.

















